W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 12:14:00 +0200
To: "Philip & Le Khanh" <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C HTML Mailing List" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.trwhdmq564w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Sun, 06 May 2007 12:06:08 +0200, Philip & Le Khanh  
<Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> wrote:
> But it uses this phrase in the context of deliverables that
> are "in scope", rather than mandated, if my understanding
> of the charter is correct.

In http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#scope it says:

    The Group will define conformance and parsing requirements
    for 'classic HTML', taking into account legacy
    implementations; the Group will not assume that an SGML
    parser is used for 'classic HTML'.

"will define" seems pretty clear to me.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 10:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:20 UTC