- From: Alan Dean <alan.dean@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:02:57 +0100
- To: "David Hyatt" <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Would this also work for 'river of news' style readers, for example Google Reader, which do not reload the whole page? Without 'globally unique scoping' I imagine that scope collisions would arise frequently, possibly implying a considerable 'scope management tax'. Alan On 5/27/07, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote: > <style scoped> would handle this use case. A feed aggregator that > did the stitching together of multiple feeds would want to add the > scoped attribute if missing to any <style> elements from individual > feed fragments anyway (to avoid style collisions between different > feeds). > > The "stitching together" use case is where scoped style really > shines. I am proposing that <style scoped> would still be conformant > if used outside the <head>, but that an unscoped <style> would not > (because of its dangerous property of applying to the entire page > content, which is virtually never what the author actually intended). > > dave > > On May 27, 2007, at 1:23 AM, Alan Dean wrote: > > > Dave, > > > > If I understand the nature of the markup constraint that you request, > > would this not make html5 fragments much harder to work with, in the > > context of RSS / Atom / etc feeds? The author does not control the > > <head> element in that case, and so would be unable to apply any > > inline styling to 'html5 conforming' fragments. Or am I missing > > something? > > > > Regards, > > Alan Dean > > http://thoughtpad.net/alan-dean > >
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 09:03:03 UTC