- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:28:12 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
Hi Thomas,
> But I believe that role= is worth being in the markup for HTML5 (even
> if the future "rolesheet" language then defines a "*[role] { role:
> attr(role); }" default rule, similar to the "b { font-weight: bold; }"
> default CSS rule in browsers).
>
> In brief, I'm not arguing that we should have "rolesheets", I'm
> arguing that we should have role= within the markup (if proven that we
> need it), eventually in addition to "rolesheets" (and rolesheets are
> far more "virtual" for now than a role= attribute in HTML5)
Sure, we definitely agree on that. A number of different mechanisms
would be really useful, but @role is certainly the right thing to do
in HTML 5.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer
mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
standards. innovation.
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 17:28:16 UTC