- From: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:09:37 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
On 4 May 2007, at 09:51, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Speaking of which, I'm not really sure why the UA parsing >> requirements with respect to processing invalid content need to be >> normative at all. As far as I can tell, there's really no need to >> make them normative. > > If you don't make the processing requirements normative, then UAs > can just implement whatever they like and claim conformance. That > doesn't help anyone at all, it just leaves us with the same > situation we're in now. We're trying to fix the problem, not just > ignore it. I agree, we are trying to fix it, We just don't agree on the method of fix. I do agree that whatever the decision, it is fundamental that it is documented so that it is standard behaviour across UAs. Gaz
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 09:10:00 UTC