W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions

From: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:08:07 +0200
Message-ID: <e2c275120705150708w7ba2e4canf65d5623f79c0c69@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>

On 5/10/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> FYI: For voting only one representative of a company can cast a vote
> counting for the company or organization he represents. This basically
> means that I, for instance, am not a Working Group Member, but part of one
> Member that has joined the Working Group.
> As for Opera, we internally decided that Lars Erik Bolstad will cast votes
> and make descisions on behalf of Opera within the Working Group when
> needed. I would expect that other Member companies / organizations have
> similar policies.
> Section 3.4 of the W3C Process document discusses this issue in more
> detail:
>    http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#Votes

But in our group, we've got much more invited experts than usual. If
the rec has to be implemented in two UA, shouldn't we consider that a
vote can't be valid unless two browser makers have voted for the
chosen solution ?

Olivier G.
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 14:33:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:20 UTC