- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 15:12:02 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
Jason A. Lefkowitz asked, quote: > BLOCKQUOTE is presentational? It's meaningful semantically - > - it indicates a block of content that's not original to the > document it's embedded in... unquote i won't burden the list with my full argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE, but will point you to my proposal to deprecate BLOCKQUOTE, after listing a few bullet points: 1) a quote is a quote is a quote: one element should be sufficient to quote indicate a block of content that's not original to the document it's embedded in unquote -- that's the very definition of a quote; 2) BLOCKQUOTE is presentational in nature; 3) BLOCKQUOTE is a hold-over from print conventions WITHOUT semantic meaning (unless you call an arbitrary number of sentences seperated from the main text by blank lines and indented margins semantically meaningful); 4) why not a single Q or QUOTE element that flows (can serve as an inline or block element such as INS and DEL (at least in HTML4x); please take the time to read my original proposal, archived at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/0102.html as well as the threaded discussion that it sparked.
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:12:19 UTC