Thursday, 31 May 2007
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- [Fwd: RE: headers attribute debate]
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Re[2]: WF2, abolish <button type=remove>
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Common pool of examples and validation
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re: WF2, abolish <button type=remove>
- Re: Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
Thursday, 31 May 2007
Monday, 28 May 2007
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
Thursday, 31 May 2007
- Re: Common pool of examples and validation
- Re: Common pool of examples and validation
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Re: [whatwg] setting .src of a SCRIPT element
- Re: Common pool of examples and validation
- Re: [whatwg] setting .src of a SCRIPT element
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Common pool of examples and validation
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: Form elements
- Re: Form elements
- Re: Form elements
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
- Re: will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
- Re: Horizontal menu-2
- Moving forward?
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Re: Form elements
- Re: Form elements
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?
- Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
Monday, 28 May 2007
- Re: will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
- Re: will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
- Re: will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
- will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Re: Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)
Sunday, 27 May 2007
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: headers attribute debate
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
Saturday, 26 May 2007
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- headers attribute debate
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: <code type="...">
Friday, 25 May 2007
- Re: <code type="...">
- <code type="...">
- Re: Form elements
- Re: Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)
- Re: Form elements
- Form elements
- Re: Leading BOM
- Leading BOM
- Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)
- Re: Horizontal menu-2
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Horizontal menu-2
- WA, <input> for folders
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
Thursday, 24 May 2007
Friday, 25 May 2007
Thursday, 24 May 2007
- Re: Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF
- Re: Complex Table Examples
Wednesday, 23 May 2007
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re: Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF
- Re: Reminder: HTML in email Workshop tomorrow in Paris
- Re: Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Reminder: HTML in email Workshop tomorrow in Paris
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
Tuesday, 22 May 2007
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: 'role' should be property
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: WF2, abolish <button type=remove>
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- eleding, sag, seribute
Monday, 21 May 2007
- WF2, attach hidden xml
- Re[2]: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- WF2, abolish <button type=remove>
Tuesday, 22 May 2007
Monday, 21 May 2007
Tuesday, 22 May 2007
Monday, 21 May 2007
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: @role inheritance (nested tags) behavior, and a RFP
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- RE: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
- Re: Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
- Re: Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
- Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place
Friday, 18 May 2007
Saturday, 19 May 2007
Sunday, 20 May 2007
Saturday, 19 May 2007
Friday, 18 May 2007
- action="mailto:"
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
- Re: Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: #:body.h2[5]
- Re: Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF
- Re: Number of list item
- Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
- Re: #:body.h2[5]
- Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Re: Author incentives for accessibility
- Author incentives for accessibility
Thursday, 17 May 2007
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- RE: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Complex Table Examples
- Re: Paving Cowpaths
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Paving Cowpaths
- Working Group XTech un-BOF
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
Wednesday, 16 May 2007
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: Scope of @role (or @class)
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- @role inheritance (nested tags) behavior, and a RFP
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: Microformat support
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Microformat support
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: Scope of @role (or @class)
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Scope of @role (or @class)
- @role, @class, @id and copyright information
- Re: Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Re: Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Re: Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- RE: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
Tuesday, 15 May 2007
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- RE: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- RE: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Re: Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
Monday, 14 May 2007
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- toward HTML spec review: issue tracking, breadth-first/depth-first, etc.
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re-group, re-focus, reply (RE: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- Re: "voting" Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
Sunday, 13 May 2007
Saturday, 12 May 2007
Friday, 11 May 2007
- Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- RE: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- [html5] Primordial question. Part II.
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Take the rest of the week off. Really.
- "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle
- [html5] Primordial question.
- Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- RE: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Re: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Re: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Re: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Re: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Re: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Re: A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
Thursday, 10 May 2007
- A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.
- Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
- Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
- Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- <form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
Wednesday, 9 May 2007
- Slides and IRC log of "Future of the Web Page" session at WWW 2007
- results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Fwd: Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: HTML:html@profile
- Re: HTML:html@profile
Tuesday, 8 May 2007
- Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Re: HTML:html@profile
- Re: HTML:html@profile
- Re: Testing Accessibility Re: Accessibility is for everyone
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Re: HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Re: HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)
- Re: Testing Accessibility Re: Accessibility is for everyone
- New member - Frank Palinkas
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: BoF at XTech
- Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML
- Extension Mechanism for HTML (was: Re: Predefined Class Names Solution)
- Re: WYSIWYG HTML Textareas
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Support Existing Content
- class/id values on default Blogs templates
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Error handling and legacy content
- Re: Moving on
- Re: Semantics - Mystery of the Menu tag
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
Monday, 7 May 2007
- Testing Accessibility Re: Accessibility is for everyone
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- continuous? evolution of @class [was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)]
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- RE: The Semantic Debate
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- RE: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- RE: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: The Semantic Debate
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- RE: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- The Semantic Debate
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- @role (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution
- Re: Predefined Class Names Solution (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Moving on
- Re: Moving on
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Moving on
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
Sunday, 6 May 2007
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element?
- Re: Why not a <copyright> element (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element? (was: Why not a <copyright> element )
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: predefined class names (was Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- 544 reasons to take a look at XForms 1.1
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Research for class="copyright" (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Why not a <copyright> element (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Why not a <copyright> element (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Research for class="copyright"
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Research for class="copyright" (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Cleaning House
- Prepositions in final position
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: predefined class names
- Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: predefined class names (was Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: predefined class names (was Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
Saturday, 5 May 2007
Sunday, 6 May 2007
Saturday, 5 May 2007
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Proposed list of predefined class names
- Re: copyright issue [RE: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3]
- Re: copyright issue [RE: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3]
- RE: Prescriptivism and Descriptivism in Linguistics (was Re: Support Existing Content)
- Re: Proposed list of predefined class names (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- (was: Re: Cleaning House)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Proposed list of predefined class names
- Re: Proposed list of predefined class names
- Re: Proposed list of predefined class names
- Proposed list of predefined class names (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: copyright issue [RE: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3]
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Applicable elements for predefined classnames
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- copyright issue [RE: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3]
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Predefined classnames v/s roles (was: RE:Getting beyond the ping pong match)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Semantics - Mystery of the Menu tag
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Formal Objection in Questions 1 and 3 on the Ballot
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Formal Objection in Questions 1 and 3 on the Ballot
- Re: Formal Objection in Questions 1 and 3 on the Ballot
- Re: Support Existing Content
Friday, 4 May 2007
- Re: Support Existing Content
- RE: Support Existing Content
- Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3
- Re: Formal Objection in Questions 1 and 3 on the Ballot
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Formal Objection in Questions 1 and 3 on the Ballot
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Support Existing Content
- RE: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Prescriptivism and Descriptivism in Linguistics (was Re: Support Existing Content)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Semantics - Mystery of the Menu tag
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
Thursday, 3 May 2007
Friday, 4 May 2007
Thursday, 3 May 2007
Friday, 4 May 2007
Thursday, 3 May 2007
Friday, 4 May 2007
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Versioning and html[5] : application/xhtml+xml
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- RE: Support Existing Content
- RE: Versioning and html[5] : application/xhtml+xml
- Re: Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Support Existing Content
- importance and emphasis [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- [OT] Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Technical motivation (was: Re: Support Existing Content)
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Several button "Submit"
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Versioning and html[5] : application/xhtml+xml
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Versioning and html[5] : application/xhtml+xml
- Consensus and Legacy Compatibility (was: Support Existing Content)
- RE: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- RE: Is HTML5 Too Big?
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Is HTML5 Too Big?
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
Thursday, 3 May 2007
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: forms task force volunteers? (tasks survey)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: forms task force volunteers? (tasks survey)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements (was: Re: Rethinking HTML 5)
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Forms Task Force Charter Requirement
- Re: a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Cleaning House
- a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- EM is not synonomous with I, nor STRONG with B
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- abbreviation exposition and pronunciation
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: User agent requirements and document conformance (was: Re: Cleaning House)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: User agent requirements and document conformance (was: Re: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- WYSIWYG HTML Textareas
- abbreviation exposition and pronunciation
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: help navigating your HTML spec text objection?
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: <font>
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: In the interest of opening a new can of worms...
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: [whatwg] <font>
- Re: User agent requirements and document conformance (was: Re: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- User agent requirements and document conformance (was: Re: Cleaning House)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: HTML WG tasks survey results, the remix
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: [whatwg] <font>
- Re: Cleaning House
- pardon for repetition
- RE: Cleaning House
- 3 mathematical symbols without MathML
- Stretching of brackets
- Stretching of brackets
- Stretching of brackets
- 3 mathematical symbols without MathML
- Stretching of brackets
- 3 mathematical symbols without MathML
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: <font>
- RE: Cleaning House
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers>
- HTML WG tasks survey results, the remix
- Re: Several button "Submit"
- forms task force volunteers? (tasks survey)
- Re: Cleaning House
Wednesday, 2 May 2007
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: HTML forms
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- HTML forms
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: [whatwg] <font>
- Re: Roll-down menu
- Re: Several button "Submit"
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- In the interest of opening a new can of worms...
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Testcase for XMP tag
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Error handling and legacy content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Several button "Submit"
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Testcase for XMP tag
- Re: Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements
- Re: Roll-down menu
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Several button "Submit"
- Re: Cleaning House
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Number of list item
- Cleaning House
- Several button "Submit"
- Number of list item
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: <font>
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
Tuesday, 1 May 2007
Wednesday, 2 May 2007
- Re: Support Existing Content / consensus through attrition?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: Roll-down menu
- Re: Dynamic renovation of values
- Re: Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements
- Re: Support Existing Content / consensus through attrition?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements
- Re: <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
Tuesday, 1 May 2007
Wednesday, 2 May 2007
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Error handling and legacy content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- <table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Error handling and legacy content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Exterior view of anchor
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements
Tuesday, 1 May 2007
Wednesday, 2 May 2007
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Dynamic renovation of values
- Exterior view of anchor
- Roll-down menu
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- RE: Off-topic : response to Maciej Stachowiak in re e-mail
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- RE: Mostly Harmless or Warning Label Required? [was RE: Review of Proposed Design Principles]
- Re: Mostly Harmless or Warning Label Required? [was RE: Review of Proposed Design Principles]
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Mostly Harmless or Warning Label Required? [was RE: Review of Proposed Design Principles]
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Tuesday, 1 May 2007
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Off-topic : response to Maciej Stachowiak in re e-mail
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Decision process: Formal Objections and consensus in the W3C process
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Off-topic : response to Maciej Stachowiak in re e-mail
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: <font>
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements (was: Re: Rethinking HTML 5)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Review of Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Review of Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Review of Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Versioning and the end user
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Testcase for XMP tag
- Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: missing principle
- Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
- Re: missing principle
- Re: Support Existing Content
- offtopic news: Court rules in Microsoft's favour on patents; Supreme Court also weighs in
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Versioning and the end user
- Re: Support Existing Content
- RE: Support Existing Content
- Re: missing principle
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- RE: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Monday, 30 April 2007
Tuesday, 1 May 2007
- Re: [whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Rationale for removing the summary and headers attributes from tables?
- Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- HTML classes of products Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
- Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)