- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:19:18 +0900
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
Le 6 mai 2007 à 11:43, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
> Please consider the following two steps :
(very good authoring scenario given by Daniel)
> <h2><i>bar</i>foo</h2>
> As a conclusion, I would say that <h2><i>foo</i></foo> is not only
> acceptable but MUST be accepted if you want to have wysiwyg editors.
> This is a mandatory compromise if you want to have editing tools
> average people are able to use. Otherwise, you'll have code purity
> and a software behaviour people don't understand.
* Do you think the way this kind of things are edited can be
described normatively? (or impossible because too many cases.)
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 05:20:16 UTC