- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 00:27:33 +0300
- To: Jukka K.Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
On May 5, 2007, at 23:30, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > When an author used class="copyright" for whatever reason (styling, > scripting, documentation), we have no right to infer that he meant > semantics specified for this attribute years later in a draft. When Google started inferring authority from links, did they ask anyone if they had the right? > (For example, in my page about intellectual rights, I may well have > marked parts _discussing_ copyright issues with such an attribute, I know you have pages discussing copyright but do you really use class='copyright' for something other than copyright notices? Do you expect the usage of class='copyright' for something other than copyright notices to be a common practice to a degree that it would be unreasonable to assume that class='copyright' marks a copyright notice? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 21:27:46 UTC