- From: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:54:55 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 10:55:14 UTC
On 2 May 2007, at 11:23, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Mozilla (a browser vendor) is funding the development of an HTML5 > conformance checker. Rejecting non-conforming content in browsers > is not the right way to "encourage" because it would make new > browsers less permissive and would give the impression to users > that old browsers work better with real content. The methods you suggest have been in place through the development of previous versions of HTML and yet we still have the same problems today. The time for "encouraging" /I/ believe should be over. After all, if I claim I can plumb in a toilet bowl and get somewhere near, but not quite, and you are forced to put a bucket in the bowl to make it work, would I still be a plumber? Is it acceptable because you have had to modify my solution to work, or is it my fault because I didn't do my job? That is my view, and I haven't read anything to come close to altering my view. I also /believe/ this to be true of the other side of the argument. since the other side is browser vendors and the people who have been 'driving hmtl' for decades, I am clearly wrong. Gareth
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 10:55:14 UTC