- From: Bruce Lawson <bruce.c.lawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:50:07 +0100
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html@w3.org, www-html@w3.org, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Message-ID: <197f58d30705040450kcb24234ud2ea4cb03ac35eb4@mail.gmail.com>
I'm confused. "The relative level of importance of a piece of content is given by its number of ancestor strong<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#strong>elements; each strong <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#strong> element increases the importance of its contents. Changing the importance of a piece of text with the strong<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#strong>element does not change the meaning of the sentence." How can changing the importance not change the meaning? Or is there a difference between "piece of content" and "piece of text", so the spec here refers to the differing behviour of marking two different types of content with same element? bruce On 5/4/07, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > > > Quoting Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>: > > > Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > >> Quoting Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>: > >>> Note that the current WHATWG HTML5 proposal defines <strong> as > >>> denoting importance and <em> as denoting emphasis. For "strong > >>> emphasis" you would use nested <em> elements. > >> > >> The difference being...what exactly? > > > > Read the spec. > > > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-strong > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-em > > I assume you refer to > > "Changing the importance of a piece of text with the strong element > does not change the meaning of the sentence." > > and > > "The placement of emphasis changes the meaning of the sentence." > > Which is a distinction that, despite the copious examples for <em>, > feels artificial... > > Ho hum, > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > ______________________________________________________________ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com > ______________________________________________________________ > Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force > http://webstandards.org/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team > http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ > ______________________________________________________________ > >
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 11:50:17 UTC