- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:26:04 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi Dan, You seem to have misquoted the vision document that you linked to. On May 2, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > An architectural vision document released with the charters > elaborates: > > The charter calls for two equivalent serializations to be developed, > corresponding to a single DOM (or infoset, though tag soup cannot be > considered to have an infoset currently, while it can have a > DOM). This ensures that decisions are not made which would not > preclude an XML serialization. It allows the two serializations to > be inter-converted automatically. Having new language features, > there is an incentive for content authors to use it; and having > client-side implementations means that there is the possibility to > really use it. This text actually reads as below, I added brackets around the parts you seem to have misquoted: "[Instead, t]he charter calls for two equivalent serializations to be developed[ by the HTML WG], corresponding to a single DOM (or infoset, though tag soup cannot be considered to have an infoset currently, while it can have a DOM). This ensures that decisions are not made which would preclude an XML serialization. It allows the two serializations to be inter-converted automatically. Having new language features, there is an incentive for content authors to use it; and having client-side implementations means that there is the possibility to really use it. The phrase "by the HTML WG" which you omitted is especially notable. > -- http://www.w3.org/2007/03/vision.html Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 21:26:10 UTC