Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>

On Sun, 27 May 2007 09:10:47 +0100, David Hyatt <> wrote:

>> Making <style scoped> apply to nodes that follow the parent of <style  
>> scoped> in document order traversal seems counter-intuitive from the  
>> point of view of authoring documents. For authoring intuitiveness,  
>> limiting the scope to the subtree rooted at the parent of <style  
>> scoped> makes more sense.
> I see what you mean.  However, I still don't think <style scoped> should  
> apply to any prior content.  Ideally scoped would be defined in such a  
> way that no re-resolution has to occur as you do a forward parse of the  
> document.  What about the intersection of the two approaches?  Limiting  
> the scope only to following siblings of <style> (and their descendants)?

Maybe <style scoped> should be allowed only as a first child of its parent  

regards, Kornel Lesinski

Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 19:40:55 UTC