- From: Preston L. Bannister <preston@bannister.us>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:19:46 -0700
- To: public-html@w3c.org
- Message-ID: <7e91ba7e0705211019v27a84c55od6588ca490f3f71a@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/21/07, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > David P. Dailey wrote: > >In my mind there are sorta two different things that a spec provides (and > probably more): > > > >1. Instructions to folks who make browsers > >2. Instructions to folks who make web pages > > As much as I'd love to subscribe to this philosophy, David, I think the > problem is that the folks who make web pages (to make a gross > generalization) don't read the HTML spec except as a last resort. They type > into Notepad (or similar text editor). The browser is their error-checker. > The browser is a reality check, and the HTML spec is a fantasy. Want to guess how many times I have read the documentation, put together a prototype, then found that IE or Firefox did something ... unexpected? On balance, given the great interest expressed in making HTML5 implementations closer to the spec, there is a (outside) chance the HTML5 spec will be of more use to authors.
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 17:19:51 UTC