- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:23:22 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
Quoting Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>: > On Fri, 04 May 2007 11:00:22 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: >>> I dislike the practically non-existent distinction between <em> >>> and <strong> >> >> Yup. > > Note that the current WHATWG HTML5 proposal defines <strong> as > denoting importance and <em> as denoting emphasis. For "strong > emphasis" you would use nested <em> elements. The difference being...what exactly? In other words: when do you want to emphasise something that is not important, or conversely if something is important, wouldn't it also be emphasised? Or is this to allow for marking something up as important, but without any distinction in how it's presented? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 10:26:19 UTC