- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:16:14 -0700
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:17:19 UTC
On May 1, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > Daniel Glazman wrote: > > > > I think we miss one principle about the ubiquity of HTML. HTML is > not > > only used in web browsers. It's used in email > > In the view of many (most ?), HTML is /abused/ in e-mail. E-mail > is about the communication of information, and can invariably > best be accomplished using text/plain. Most would like to be able to put some bold or italic text in their email, or embed a picture, or include a list, without concerning themselves with the format. They don't know or care that it is HTML. I notice that you set some of your text in pseudo-italics using the slash convention: "/abused/". Why is that invariably a better way of communicating information than using real italics: "abused"? Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:17:19 UTC