- From: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:52:52 +0200
- To: "Bruce Boughton" <bruce@bruceboughton.me.uk>
- Cc: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 5/16/07, Bruce Boughton <bruce@bruceboughton.me.uk> wrote: > Matthew Raymond wrote: > > It also means that if we decide to use |role|, and we want roles that > > are only used once per page, we're going to need a |roleid| attribute. > > While I agree that @id may harbour some semantics (as per the initial > post), I don't see how this means we need @roleid in addition to the > proposed @role. Role would most likely be specified in addition to @id, > each for their own purpose (role for semantics, @id for styling or > fragment linking). And as every values (or groups of) of role will be specified, we could have values that should be unique, while some other could be many times on the same page. -- Olivier G. http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 12:52:55 UTC