Re: Rethinking HTML 5

David Dorward wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 01:41:27AM +1000, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>>> Perhaps if those implementation conformance constraints were defined in 
>>> a separate specification, it would help to clearly divide the issue?
>> I do not think it is a good idea to remove the user agent requirements 
>> from a spec for which we actually intend to get implementations.
> I believe that there are a number of people who consider that new-HTML
> should be defined in one specification, with user agent requirements,
> and that how-to-parse-junk-on-the-web is a worthy project, but should
> be handled by a seperate spec.

+1 (ducks)


Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 16:36:39 UTC