Re: Moving on

Le 7 mai 2007 à 21:17, Sam Ruby a écrit :
> Philip & Le Khanh wrote:
>> 1) Do you agree that HTML 5 should include all the elements
>>    and attributes currently allowed in HTML 4.01 Strict ?
> An alternative phrasing which will likely get quite different results:
> 1) Do you believe that HTML 5 conformance checkers should flag as
>    an error commonly used tags which are widely supported and pose
>    no interoperability issues?

Which leads to another questions.

How do we know it is supported?
How well supported?
In which class of products?

Ex: What does that mean to support blockquote?

Karl Dubost -
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog -
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 03:23:32 UTC