- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:22:39 +0900
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>, www-html@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 7 mai 2007 à 21:17, Sam Ruby a écrit :
> Philip & Le Khanh wrote:
>> 1) Do you agree that HTML 5 should include all the elements
>> and attributes currently allowed in HTML 4.01 Strict ?
>
> An alternative phrasing which will likely get quite different results:
>
> 1) Do you believe that HTML 5 conformance checkers should flag as
> an error commonly used tags which are widely supported and pose
> no interoperability issues?
Which leads to another questions.
How do we know it is supported?
How well supported?
In which class of products?
Ex: What does that mean to support blockquote?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 03:23:32 UTC