Re: Moving on

Philip & Le Khanh wrote:
> 1) Do you agree that HTML 5 should include all the elements
>    and attributes currently allowed in HTML 4.01 Strict ?

An alternative phrasing which will likely get quite different results:

1) Do you believe that HTML 5 conformance checkers should flag as
    an error commonly used tags which are widely supported and pose
    no interoperability issues?

- Sam Ruby

Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 12:17:59 UTC