- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 08:17:48 -0400
- To: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- CC: www-html@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Philip & Le Khanh wrote:
>
> 1) Do you agree that HTML 5 should include all the elements
> and attributes currently allowed in HTML 4.01 Strict ?
An alternative phrasing which will likely get quite different results:
1) Do you believe that HTML 5 conformance checkers should flag as
an error commonly used tags which are widely supported and pose
no interoperability issues?
- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 12:17:59 UTC