W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Common pool of examples and validation

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:41:31 +0300
Message-Id: <8E4B48B5-0990-46DE-B849-8CA2D51F3B9E@iki.fi>
Cc: "Preston L.Bannister" <preston@bannister.us>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>

On May 31, 2007, at 08:42, Karl Dubost wrote:

> * a unique identifier (URI should be fine)
> * a short title
> * purpose of the test
> * a description
> * reference to the specification
> * expected results

For all kinds of HTML5 test cases, it would be very useful to have a  
machine-readable annotation of whether the document is supposed to be  
conforming even if the test case has been written for another purpose  
such as browser testing. (This could be considered to be part of  
"expected results" but for test written for other purposes it may not  
automatically be.)

Henri Sivonen
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 06:42:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:21 UTC