- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 18:46:45 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > [snip] > If you assign special meanings to class names, you change the meaning of > existing pages, and if these meanings have any effect on rendering, you > are also messing up with authors' intentions on presentation. > [long snip] Hear hear. The pre-emptive strike on half a dozen "obvious" class names seemed to me a major error. If a r\^ole (and I used the word advisedly) can reasonably be ascribed to more than one element, and if there are a small number of clearly- identifiable and recurring r\^oles, then I would far sooner that HTML 5 added a "role" attribute, and proposed a central registry for registering r\^ole names, rather than usurping the use of "class". Philip Taylor
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 17:46:58 UTC