Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)

Gervase Markham wrote:
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Personally I think this was a very poor decision. The problem is that
>> you have user names and standard names mixed in the same namespace. So
>> there's a big risk that the user accidentally ends up marking semantic
>> meaning to their elements simply by wanting to style them.
>> The only thing that can be done to help this problem (other than by
>> using the role attribute) is to use really obscure names for predefined
>> classes, which doesn't seem like a great idea either.
> Or have a known prefix, currently unused (either because the standard
> doesn't allow one of the characters, or by general practice). It's
> potentially a little ugly, but it allows the rest of the name to be
> meaningful.
> One possible suitable prefix would be the underscore _.

Yup, Maciej suggested the same thing. I sort of like the '_' prefix 
since it's the same as used for targets (i.e. _blank, _parent etc). It's 
also easy to match in CSS;

._copyright { ... }

/ Jonas

Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 09:17:34 UTC