w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from January to March 2002 by date

Monday, 1 April 2002

• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood

Sunday, 31 March 2002

• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood

Friday, 29 March 2002

• RE: Post-F2F: Meeting Jack La Lanne Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Post-F2F: Meeting Jack La Lanne Patrick Burke
• Post-F2F: Meeting Jack La Lanne Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Questions from Face to Face Joe Clark

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• update on compaq and XP Robert Neff
• label bug in MacIE Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: media:popups, the good, the bad and the ugly: Access Systems
• media:popups, the good, the bad and the ugly: David Poehlman
• RE: charles points out correctly:Fw: Published work on Accessibility available Simon White
• charles points out correctly:Fw: Published work on Accessibility available David Poehlman
• Re: Published work on Accessibility available David Poehlman
• RE: Published work on Accessibility available SHARPE, Ian
• Re: csun paper on access to the web by screen readers and web to speech software David Poehlman

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• Re: csun paper on access to the web by screen readers and web to speech software Jean-Marie D'Amour
• RE: Published work on Accessibility available Jim Thatcher
• Re: Published work on Accessibility available Aaron Smith
• Published work on Accessibility available Dana Louise Simberkoff
• debugging your list subscription [was: Re: Apologies for this post] Al Gilman
• Apologies for this post Simon White

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

• Re: Another CSS question Charles McCathieNevile
• Another CSS question SHARPE, Ian
• Re: another alt question Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Something else interesting from the BBC Access Systems
• AskAlice[TM] Joe Clark

Monday, 25 March 2002

• RE: 508 tool comparisons Robert Neff
• csun paper on access to the web by screen readers and web to speech software David Poehlman
• 508 tool comparisons User
• RE: Something else interesting from the BBC Wayne Myers
• RE: Something else interesting from the BBC Wayne Myers
• RE: Something else interesting from the BBC Simon White
• Re: Something else interesting from the BBC Access Systems
• RE: Something else interesting from the BBC SHARPE, Ian
• Something else interesting from the BBC Simon White
• newspapers and how they read Robert Neff

Sunday, 24 March 2002

• RE: Microsoft make an article about alt text... Harry Woodrow

Saturday, 23 March 2002

• dillo browser jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Microsoft make an article about alt text... Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Microsoft make an article about alt text... Harry Woodrow
• Microsoft make an article about alt text... Tom Gilder
• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood

Friday, 22 March 2002

• Re: Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Mike Scott
• Re: Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Paul Bohman
• RE: Windows XP Caution Robert Neff
• RE: Windows XP Caution Ben Canning
• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Carol Foster
• RE: Windows XP Caution Jon Hanna
• Re: Windows XP Caution David Poehlman
• Re: Can I validate a site that needs a password? Chris Croome
• Re: Mandatory field labelling David Poehlman
• Re: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Jim Ley
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Tom James
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Simon White
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Simon White

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• Re: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are David Woolley

Friday, 22 March 2002

• RE: Mandatory field labelling Jukka Korpela

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• Re: Can I validate a site that needs a password? David Woolley
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour David Woolley

Friday, 22 March 2002

• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Mike Scott
• RE: Windows XP Caution Ben Canning
• Re: Windows XP Caution Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Pedlow, Robert
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Access Systems
• Windows XP Caution Robert Neff
• Re: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Access Systems
• Re: Can I validate a site that needs a password? Lynn Alford

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• RE: Can I validate a site that needs a password? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour Nick Kew
• Re: Mandatory field labelling Chris Croome
• Re: Can I validate a site that needs a password? Jim Byrne
• RE: How assistive software supports Web Accessibility Cynthia Waddell
• RE: Can I validate a site that needs a password? Jon Hanna
• Can I validate a site that needs a password? Jim Byrne
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Simon White
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Tom James
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are SHARPE, Ian
• RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are RUST Randal
• These are accessible? I'm not sure they are Simon White
• techdis: a service supporting the further and higher education community in all aspects of technology and disabilities and/or learning difficulties. Jonathan Chetwynd
• screen readers and labels RUST Randal
• RE: Mandatory field labelling RUST Randal
• RE: Mandatory field labelling Tom James
• RE: Mandatory field labelling Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Mandatory field labelling RUST Randal
• Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Jim Byrne
• MCU: New Articles: Websites and Legislation Jim Byrne
• Mandatory field labelling SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood
• RE: undue burdon/ Hooks v. OKBridge Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Al Gilman
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Denise Wood
• RE: undue burdon/ Hooks v. OKBridge Martin Sloan
• RE: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Simon White
• Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Jim Byrne
• How assistive technology supports web accessibility Kelly Boychuk

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

• RE: unasked for downloads? Danny Ayers
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour David Woolley
• Re: javascript commands David Woolley
• Re: unasked for downloads? Al Gilman
• Accessible e learning platform Christian Seus
• Re: unasked for downloads? Access Systems
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour Rebecca Cox
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour Nick Kew
• Re: unasked for downloads? Al Gilman
• CORRECTED: April Online Course: Accessible Web Design Kynn Bartlett
• Re: unasked for downloads? Access Systems
• Kynn at CSUN Conference Kynn Bartlett
• April Online Course: Accessible Web Design Kynn Bartlett
• RE: undue burdon/ Hooks v. OKBridge Jason Megginson
• unasked for downloads? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Presentation Announcement tom mcCain
• Presentation Announcement RUST Randal
• Re: javascript commands Jim Ley
• RE: SVG to image maps? Danny Ayers
• RE: Out of topic but... What about usability ? James Newbery
• Re: SVG to image maps? Max Froumentin
• Out of topic but... What about usability ? Jérôme Ernu
• How assistive software supports Web Accessibility Jean-Marie D'Amour
• Re: javascript commands David Woolley
• Re: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour David Woolley
• RE: Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour Jukka Korpela
• How assistive software Jean-Marie D'Amour
• Discussion: WCAG Test Tool Behaviour Nick Kew

Monday, 18 March 2002

• Re: speech only links Al Gilman
• RE: SVG to image maps? Danny Ayers
• Re: SVG to image maps? Chris Lilley
• Re: javascript commands Jim Ley
• Re: javascript commands David Woolley
• Re: javascript commands Jim Ley
• Re: javascript commands Access Systems
• Re: request: check site for accessibility goliver@accease.com
• Re: javascript commands Jim Ley
• javascript commands Martin McCormick
• SVG to image maps? Danny Ayers
• RE: Hooks v. OKBridge Martin Sloan
• Re: Hooks v. OKBridge Martin Sloan
• Re: request: check site for accessibility Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: speech only links Seth Rothberg
• Re: request: check site for accessibility Access Systems
• request: check site for accessibility RUST Randal
• Re: speech only links Al Gilman
• Hooks v. OKBridge RUST Randal
• RE: speech only links Jukka Korpela
• RE: CSS2 :lang pseudo-class [Was: Re: proper coding or use for md ash] Jukka Korpela

Sunday, 17 March 2002

• speech only links Seth Rothberg
• Re: FW Request/help Denise Wood
• Re: FW Request/help Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: FW Request/help Denise Wood

Saturday, 16 March 2002

• Re: review of Web Eyes Jean-Marie D'Amour
• RE: Frontpage 2002 Robert Neff
• Re: Frontpage 2002 Kathleen Anderson
• Frontpage 2002 Robert Neff

Friday, 15 March 2002

• Standard Posted on NISO Website Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• CSS2 :lang pseudo-class [Was: Re: proper coding or use for mdash] Chris Croome
• RE: review of Web Eyes Jim Thatcher
• RE: review of Web Eyes Simon White
• Fw: WebCT David Poehlman
• review of Web Eyes David Poehlman
• RE: CSS positioning Michael R. Burks
• RE: CSS positioning Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: CSS positioning SHARPE, Ian
• Re: CSS positioning Kynn Bartlett

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• Re: CSS positioning David Woolley

Friday, 15 March 2002

• Re: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Fwd: Registration open for WAI meetings following CSUN 2002 Judy Brewer
• RE: aural style sheets Access Systems

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• RE: JAVASCRIPT rollovers Denise Wood
• Re: CSS positioning Kynn Bartlett
• RE: media:WebmasterBase - Interview - Kynn Bartlett Kynn Bartlett
• Fw: Captioning for Windows Media files-new feature in AccVerify/AccRepair 4.0 David Poehlman
• Re: media:WebmasterBase - Interview - Kynn Bartlett David Poehlman
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Mike Scott
• RE: media:WebmasterBase - Interview - Kynn Bartlett Simon White
• Re: CSS positioning Jim Ley
• Re: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Tina Marie Holmboe
• media:WebmasterBase - Interview - Kynn Bartlett David Poehlman
• CSS positioning SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Simon White
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Richard Bowers
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Harry Woodrow
• Re: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? David Sloan
• RE: LABEL and/or TITLE In Forms? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• announce: email archive changes in process Al Gilman
• Recognised courses in Web Accessibility? Simon White
• [ot] RE: help with longdesc needed Danny Ayers
• Re: LABEL and/or TITLE In Forms? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: aural style sheets Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: aural style sheets Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: help with longdesc needed Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: LABEL and/or TITLE In Forms? David Woolley
• RE: LABEL and/or TITLE In Forms? Jim Thatcher

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

• LABEL and/or TITLE In Forms? Hy Cohen
• RE: JAVASCRIPT rollovers Christian Seus
• RE: Fw: Web accessibility Training (online) Nick Kew
• Re: aural style sheets David Poehlman
• Re: JAVASCRIPT rollovers David Poehlman
• RE: aural style sheets Danny Ayers
• Re: JAVASCRIPT rollovers David Poehlman
• Re: Fw: Web accessibility Training (online) David Poehlman
• RE: Fw: Web accessibility Training (online) Paul Bohman
• RE: Fw: Web accessibility Training (online) Paul Bohman
• Re: aural style sheets Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: JAVASCRIPT rollovers Denise Wood
• RE: help with longdesc needed Simon White
• aural style sheets Laura Carlson
• Re: help with longdesc needed Charles McCathieNevile
• help with longdesc needed Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: JAVASCRIPT rollovers RUST Randal
• RE: proper coding or use for mdash Jukka Korpela
• Re: <tr> and <td> closing tags dody suria wijaya
• RE: <tr> and <td> closing tags Danny Ayers
• RE: <tr> and <td> closing tags Jon Hanna
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: A couple of interesting items involving web accessibility Cynthia Waddell
• RE: Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) Jukka Korpela
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Measuring in Pixels Andrew McFarland
• Re: <tr> and <td> closing tags Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: <tr> and <td> closing tags Jukka Korpela
• <tr> and <td> closing tags dody suria wijaya
• Re: JAVASCRIPT rollovers David Woolley
• JAVASCRIPT rollovers Denise Wood
• Re: Fw: Web accessibility Training (online) Nick Kew
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash goliver@accease.com
• lost email: David Poehlman
• legend and other troublesome odities: David Poehlman
• Fw: Web accessibility Training (online) David Poehlman
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Jim Ley

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• proper coding or use for mdash Joe Clark
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash clorisval pereira jr.
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Woolley
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Woolley
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash clorisval pereira jr.
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Patrick Burke
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Poehlman
• RE: Neo Messenger Ken Reader
• RE: Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Neo Messenger Simon White
• RE: Neo Messenger Simon White
• RE: Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) Jon Hanna
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Jim Ley
• Neo Messenger Ken Reader
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Mike Scott
• Re: Accessable Chat David Poehlman
• Re: clarify "redirects" in checkpoint 7.5 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessible Chat David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk
• Re: Accessable Chat Tom Gilder
• Re: Accessable Chat David Poehlman
• RE: Accessable Chat David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Poehlman
• RE: Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) Jukka Korpela
• RE: Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) James Newbery
• RE: Measuring in Pixels Simon White
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessibility of Excel documents Kjetil Kjernsmo
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Jon Hanna
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Jukka Korpela

Monday, 11 March 2002

• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Woolley
• Re: how to get corporates to change? David Woolley
• A couple of interesting items involving web accessibility Michael R. Burks

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) goliver@accease.com
• Re: Accessable Chat Tom Gilder

Monday, 11 March 2002

• is IG down again? message sent 7 hours ago has not yet come back? Jonathan Chetwynd

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Re: proper coding or use for mdash Andrew Kirkpatrick

Monday, 11 March 2002

• Re: Accessable Chat David Poehlman
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash clorisval pereira jr.
• Re: how to get corporates to change? Al Gilman
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Mike Scott
• Re: proper coding or use for mdash Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Mike Scott
• RE: Accessable Chat Jon Hanna
• proper coding or use for mdash clorisval pereira jr.
• RE: how to get corporates to change? Danny Ayers
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessable Chat Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessable Chat Christian Seus
• HiSoftware announces versions 4.0 of Accessibility Solutions Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Re: impossible pop down? no close button Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Mike Scott
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Mike Scott
• Measuring in Pixels RUST Randal
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Jon Hanna
• Re: impossible pop down? no close button Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: how to get corporates to change? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Jim Ley
• RE: Creative (?) solution for redundant links SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text Michelle Podd
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Poehlman
• Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links David Poehlman
• RE: Accessibility of Excel documents Jon Hanna
• Re: Accessibility of Excel documents David Poehlman
• RE: Accessibility of Excel documents Simon White
• Re: Accessibility of Excel documents David Poehlman
• RE: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Harry Woodrow
• RE: screen magnifiers and fragmented text Mike Scott
• FW: Accessibility of Excel documents Simon White
• HiSoftware announces versions 4.0 of Accessibility Solutions Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Re: Accessibility of Excel documents David Poehlman
• Re: seems a few mails I sent over the weekend are lost, should I re-send them? David Poehlman
• Creative (?) solution for redundant links Mike Scott
• RE: seems a few mails I sent over the weekend are lost, should I re-send them? Simon White
• DC-ACCESSIBILITY IG Announcement (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• A couple of interesting items involving web accessibility Michael R. Burks
• seems a few mails I sent over the weekend are lost, should I re-send them? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Accessibility of Excel documents Simon White
• RE: give me a break! RUST Randal
• Re: give me a break! Kathleen Anderson
• RE: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: give me a break! RUST Randal
• RE: give me a break! Al Gilman
• RE: give me a break! Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessibility Features of SVG note Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 10 March 2002

• Accessibility Features of SVG note Danny Ayers
• Testing of 14.1 (WCAG 1.0) goliver@accease.com

Monday, 11 March 2002

• Accessibility Features of SVG note Danny Ayers
• impossible pop down? no close button Jonathan Chetwynd
• how to get corporates to change? Jonathan Chetwynd

Saturday, 9 March 2002

• RE: give me a break! Access Systems
• Re: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Accessable Chat Shane Anderson

Friday, 8 March 2002

• RE: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Mike Scott
• Re: what's an "em" Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text tom mcCain
• what's an "em" Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text Michelle Podd
• Re: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites HARRIS Rachel D
• Re: Accessable Chat Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites Graciela J. Caplan
• Re: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: Accessable Chat David Poehlman
• Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text Ian Francis
• Re: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessable Chat Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Deaf Community - Great Web Sites Jonathan Chetwynd
• Deaf Community - Great Web Sites goliver@accease.com
• Re: Accessable Chat Access Systems
• Re: CSS issues goliver@accease.com

Thursday, 7 March 2002

• Re: Fwd: Flash Nick Kew
• Accessable Chat Christian Seus
• Re: Flash David Poehlman
• RE: Software Questions Timothy Stephen Springer
• screen magnifiers and fragmented text Michelle Podd
• Fwd: Flash Aaron Smith
• Re: Software Questions David Poehlman
• RE: Software Questions Richard Bowers
• RE: Software Questions Robert B. Yonaitis
• Software Questions Scott Lubow
• AW: CSS issues Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: CSS issues Jim Ley
• CSS issues SHARPE, Ian
• AW: clarify "redirects" in checkpoint 7.5 Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: clarify "redirects" in checkpoint 7.5 David Woolley
• CSS - problem tabbing in Netscape browsers Sandra Vassallo

Wednesday, 6 March 2002

• Re: Browser Issues Phillip Pi
• Re: Browser Issues Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: clarify "redirects" in checkpoint 7.5 Tina Marie Holmboe
• clarify "redirects" in checkpoint 7.5 Rebecca Cox
• Re: Browser Issues Phillip Pi
• Re: Browser Issues Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Browser Issues Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Browser Issues Phillip Pi
• RE: Browser Issues Jon Hanna
• RE: Browser Issues Phillip Pi
• media:Fw: Benetech and VisuAide Announce Partnership to Deliver Victor David Poehlman
• Re: New version of Macromedia Flash Player enables people with disabilities to experience rich content and applications David Poehlman
• RE: standard vs guideline Richard Bowers
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Christian Seus
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind David Poehlman
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Access Systems
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: standard vs guideline Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Browser Issues Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• RE: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Jukka Korpela
• Fw: lynx-dev latest status on java script support? David Poehlman
• RE: Accessible Flash Access Systems
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Access Systems
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Access Systems
• RE: Browser Issues Access Systems
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Michel Thouati
• Re: standard vs guideline Nick Kew
• Re: standard vs guideline - I like it <eom> goliver@accease.com
• Re: standard vs guideline Access Systems
• Re: standard vs guideline Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Kynn Bartlett
• standard vs guideline Phill Jenkins

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Access Systems
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Michel Thouati
• Terminator 3? [Was: Re: Accessible Flash] Charles F. Munat
• RE: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions RUST Randal
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind RUST Randal
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Nick Kew
• Re: Accessible Flash Charles F. Munat
• Re: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Charles F. Munat
• Re: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Access Systems
• re: Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Proper Coding for Yes/No Questions RUST Randal
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Access Systems
• RE: Accessible Flash Access Systems
• Re: Accessible Flash Access Systems
• Accessible Flash Joe Clark
• RE: Accessible Flash RUST Randal
• RE: Accessible Flash Simon White
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind RUST Randal
• RE: Accessible Flash RUST Randal
• RE: Fwd: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Simon White
• Re: Interesting news article from the BBC Ian Francis
• Re: Accessible Flash Access Systems
• Re: Fwd: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Access Systems

Monday, 4 March 2002

• Re: Fwd: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Nick Kew
• Re: problems when using label element goliver@accease.com
• Re: Query systems (e.g. search engines): a proposal on specific acces sibility guidelines David Woolley
• problems when using label element Rebecca Cox
• Re: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: flash and accessability Aaron Smith
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to P eople Who Are Blind Aaron Smith
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to P eople Who Are Blind Jim Thatcher
• flash and accessability Christian Seus
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to P eople Who Are Blind Aaron Smith
• RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to P eople Who Are Blind RUST Randal
• Fwd: New version of Macromedia Flash Player enables people with disabilities to experience rich content and applications Aaron Smith
• Fwd: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind Aaron Smith
• Re: Query systems (e.g. search engines): a proposal on specific acces sibility guidelines Al Gilman
• Interesting news article from the BBC Simon White
• Accessible Flash RUST Randal
• RE: Query systems (e.g. search engines): a proposal on specific a cces sibility guidelines Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Query systems (e.g. search engines): a proposal on specific acces sibility guidelines Jukka Korpela
• RE: Fieldset grouping of items other than forms PERRY, Grant
• Fieldset grouping of items other than forms PERRY, Grant

Sunday, 3 March 2002

• Fw: Alertbox: Book on accessibility and Deep Linking is Good Linking David Poehlman

Saturday, 2 March 2002

• RE: New Guidelines in the UK Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Are there any know problems when Web pages using .js files? David Poehlman
• Community hub for Wadsworth clients Al Gilman
• Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering & Empty alt tags David Poehlman
• Re: javascript: protocol David Woolley
• Re: rationale for checkpoint 8.1 David Poehlman
• Re: javascript: protocol Jonathan Chetwynd
• Fw: FLASH David Poehlman

Friday, 1 March 2002

• Re: javascript: protocol David Woolley
• Re: javascript: protocol Jim Ley
• javascript: protocol Jon Hanna
• RE: legislation in Germany Mark Magennis
• New Guidelines in the UK Martin Sloan
• Re: rationale for checkpoint 8.1 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: rationale for checkpoint 8.1 David Woolley
• RE: alert!Fw: For users of Arachnophilia Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Empty Alt Tags gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: alert!Fw: For users of Arachnophilia gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Re: rationale for checkpoint 8.1 Nick Kew
• rationale for checkpoint 8.1 Pedlow, Robert

Thursday, 28 February 2002

• RE: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Martin Sloan
• RE: People with cognitive disabilities as a group Simon White
• RE: People with cognitive disabilities as a group Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: People with cognitive disabilities as a group Paul Davis
• RE: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering & Empty alt tags Mike Scott
• Online survey of syntactic analysis tool use Amy Thurston
• RE: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Gavin Hardman

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

• Re: legislation in Germany David Woolley
• Re: Browser Issues David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Nick Kew
• Re: Access guidelines, training, planning in University Carol Foster
• RE: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Jon Hanna
• RE: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Simon White
• Re: Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Charles McCathieNevile
• Accessibility, the law and intranets/ extranets Gavin Hardman
• RE: Section 508 is PART of the ADA? RUST Randal
• RE: FAQ Re: Section 508 is PART of the ADA? RUST Randal
• RE: Section 508 is PART of the ADA? Richard Bowers
• FAQ Re: Section 508 is PART of the ADA? Al Gilman
• RE: Section 508 is PART of the ADA? Ken Reader
• RE: Browser Issues Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Browser Issues Jim Ley
• Section 508 is PART of the ADA? RUST Randal
• Re: Browser Issues Jim Ley
• RE: Browser Issues RUST Randal
• Re: Is this a good hack? Phill Jenkins
• Re: Browser Issues Phill Jenkins
• RE: legislation in Germany RUST Randal
• Re: Browser Issues Joe Clark
• Re: Browser Issues Jim Ley
• Re: Browser Issues Jim Ley
• unfathomable CSS problem for you Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Accessibitily World Wide Legislation, regulation, etc. Michael R. Burks

Tuesday, 26 February 2002

• Re: Access guidelines, training, planning in University Al Gilman
• Re: legislation in Germany David Woolley
• Re: Browser Issues David Woolley
• RE: Access guidelines, training, planning in University Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Access guidelines, training, planning in University Simon White
• Access guidelines, training, planning in University Jim Byrne
• RE: Digital signatures and accessibility Michael R. Burks
• re: video / audio transcripts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Digital signatures and accessibility Simon White
• RE: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabiliti es Jim Tobias
• RE: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabiliti es Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: People with cognitive disabilities as a group Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Browser Issues RUST Randal
• RE: Browser Issues Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: legislation in Germany RUST Randal
• Re: video / audio transcripts Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabiliti es James Newbery
• Re: Is this a good hack? Seth Rothberg
• RE: Browser Issues RUST Randal
• RE: Browser Issues RUST Randal
• video / audio transcripts John Morse
• RE: Browser Issues RUST Randal
• Re: Browser Issues Jim Ley
• People with cognitive disabilities as a group goliver@accease.com
• People with cognitive disabilities goliver@accease.com
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Legislation about accessibility all over the countries goliver@accease.com
• Re: Browser Issues Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabiliti es Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Another good resource Simon White
• RE: Legislation about accessibility all over the countries Simon White
• Re: Legislation about accessibility all over the countries jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
• Legislation about accessibility all over the countries Jérôme Ernu
• Re: pixels are relative unit?? David Woolley
• Re: Fw: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabilities David Woolley
• Re: Browser Issues David Woolley
• Re: Fw: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? (agree) David Woolley
• Re: legislation in Germany David Woolley
• Re: Is this a good hack? David Woolley
• Re: Are there any know problems when Web pages using .js files? Phillip Pi
• Are there any know problems when Web pages using .js files? Phillip Pi
• Re: Is this a good hack? jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
• Fw: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabilities Lisa Seeman
• Re: pixels are relative unit?? goliver@accease.com

Monday, 25 February 2002

• Browser Issues RUST Randal
• pixels are relative unit?? Rebecca Cox
• legislation in Germany Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Registration open for WAI meetings following CSUN 2002 Judy Brewer
• Re: Is this my error or Bobby's? Joe Clark
• Is this a good hack? Seth Rothberg
• Re: Is this my error or Bobby's? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Denise Wood
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? (agree) Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Fw: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? (agree) Steve Carter
• Re: assistive tech and layout tables jukka.korpela@tieke.fi

Sunday, 24 February 2002

• new dos version of lynx browser: David Poehlman
• Re: Text direction, CSS and accessibility Chris Croome
• Re: Text direction, CSS and accessibility Al Gilman
• Languages and web browsers Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Text direction, CSS and accessibility Chris Croome
• Re: Text direction, CSS and accessibility David Woolley
• Text direction, CSS and accessibility Chris Croome
• Re: Empty alt tags Access Systems

Saturday, 23 February 2002

• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Ineke van der Maat
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? David Woolley
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? David Woolley
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles F. Munat
• RE: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Denise Wood
• Re: Empty alt tags Ineke van der Maat

Friday, 22 February 2002

• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles F. Munat
• Re: Empty alt tags David Poehlman
• Re: Fw: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? (agree) Seth Rothberg
• Fw: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? (agree) Ineke van der Maat
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? (agree) Al Gilman
• RE: adjusting font size and type Nick Kew
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Al Gilman
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Ineke van der Maat
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Empty alt tags Simon White
• Re: Empty alt tags Steve Carter
• Re: Empty alt tags Access Systems
• Re: Empty alt tags Charles F. Munat
• RE: Empty alt tags Jon Hanna
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Al Gilman
• RE: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering Phill Jenkins
• Re: Empty alt tags jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
• Re: Empty alt tags Ineke van der Maat
• Re: assistive tech and layout tables Al Gilman
• Re: Empty alt tags Al Gilman
• Re: Empty alt tags Petri Laatunen
• RE: Empty alt tags Jon Hanna
• Re: Empty alt tags Ineke van der Maat
• Re: adjusting font size and type Ineke van der Maat
• RE: adjusting font size and type Gavin Hardman
• Re: Empty alt tags jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
• Empty alt tags Petri Laatunen
• Re: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering David Woolley
• Re: Empty Alt Tags David Woolley
• Fw: Accessible method to capture JAWS voice output David Poehlman
• Re: applets David Poehlman
• RE: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering Al Gilman
• RE: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering Jim Thatcher
• RE: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering Jim Thatcher
• Re: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering Al Gilman

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering goliver@accease.com
• Re: applets Phill Jenkins
• Empty Alt Tags abeheler
• Accessible method to capture JAWS voice output goliver@accease.com
• Empty Alt Tags abeheler
• Two links (Image and Text) side by side - was Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering goliver@accease.com
• Re: accessibility and digital signature Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: accessibility and digital signature Michael R. Burks
• RE: Is this my error or Bobby's? Michael Cooper
• Re: Is this my error or Bobby's? Al Gilman
• Re: alert!Fw: For users of Arachnophilia Sarah Kuehnle
• alert!Fw: For users of Arachnophilia David Poehlman
• Re: assistive tech and layout tables jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
• Re: assistive tech and layout tables David Woolley

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

• Re: assistive tech and layout tables David Poehlman
• assistive tech and layout tables Michael Fry
• Usability and Accessibility Perspective (deviantART) Phillip Pi
• re: java-applets-accessbridge David Poehlman
• re: java-applets-accessbridge David Poehlman
• java-applets-accessbridge Jason Megginson
• RE: accessibility and digital signature Simon White
• RE: accessibility and digital signature Simon White
• Re: accessibility and digital signature Helle Bjarnø
• Re: applets kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Is this my error or Bobby's? Seth Rothberg

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• Re: applets Charles McCathieNevile
• applets, correction to my last post Steven McCaffrey
• Re: applets Steven McCaffrey
• applets Lubow Scott
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Vadim Plessky

Monday, 18 February 2002

• Re: Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering David Woolley

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• RE: another alt question Harry Woodrow

Monday, 18 February 2002

• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: another alt question Jon Hanna
• Re: another alt question David Poehlman
• Re: FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles F. Munat
• Re: another alt question goliver@accease.com
• Re: another alt question David Poehlman
• RE: another alt question Steven McCaffrey
• RE: another alt question Hy Cohen
• another alt question Leslie K. Yoder
• Automated reply from rosie@www.ssbtechnologies.com rosie@www.ssbtechnologies.com
• FAQ - where are the FAQs for this list? Charles McCathieNevile
• Another question about JAWS 4.01 rendering jm.damour@camo.qc.ca
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 17 February 2002

• RE: Question about JAWS rendering Kelly Ford
• RE: Question about JAWS rendering Jim Thatcher
• Question about JAWS rendering Seth Rothberg

Saturday, 16 February 2002

• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Access Systems
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Chris Croome
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS (resend) Al Gilman
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Al Gilman
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

Friday, 15 February 2002

• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS David Woolley
• [media] FWD: ExtremeTech Daily: The State of Web Accessibility Kathleen Anderson
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Seth Rothberg
• RE: FAQ - two columns using CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Audio captioning - practical questions ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ
• RE: FAQ - two columns using CSS Harry Woodrow
• FYI-Accessibility Product announcement-Microsoft FrontPage developers Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Re: FAQ - two columns using CSS Seth Rothberg
• RE: FAQ - two columns using CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: FAQ - two columns using CSS SHARPE, Ian
• FAQ - two columns using CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• New group about Web usability associated to accessibility Jérôme Ernu
• WAI meetings Judy Brewer
• Re: Audio captioning - practical questions Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 14 February 2002

• Audio captioning - practical questions ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

• GIS and CAD Systems Lubow Scott
• Fw: FW: Submit Your Proposal for WebCT's 4th Annual User Conference Today! David Poehlman

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

• Re: adjusting font size and type robert neff

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

• Re: adjusting font size and type David Poehlman
• Re: adjusting font size and type Andrew McFarland

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

• RE: adjusting font size and type Jon Hanna
• Re: adjusting font size and type Marti McCuller
• Re: adjusting font size and type ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ
• Re: adjusting font size and type David Poehlman
• adjusting font size and type robert neff
• This message is for Al Gilman robert neff
• Re: : Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Al Gilman
• off topic [long again!] [Re: Thorns pruned ] Steve Carter
• RE: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] David M. Clark
• Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Steve Carter
• Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Steve Carter
• MathML to English SHARPE, Ian

Monday, 11 February 2002

• Re: : Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] robert neff

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

• RE: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] David M. Clark

Monday, 11 February 2002

• Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Al Gilman
• Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Steve Carter
• Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Kynn Bartlett
• Thorns pruned - thanks! [long] Steve Carter

Sunday, 10 February 2002

• RE: Microsoft and accessibility goliver@accease.com
• RE: Microsoft and accessibility Denise Wood
• RE: Microsoft and accessibility Harry Woodrow

Saturday, 9 February 2002

• Re: table markup Kynn Bartlett
• Re: table markup Nick Kew
• MathML (was: Thorny one...) Kynn Bartlett
• MathML (was: Thorny one ...) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: table markup Jean-Marie D'Amour
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page David Woolley
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page David Woolley
• PROPOSAL MICHAEL HARUNA
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page David Poehlman
• Microsoft and accessibility Denise Wood
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Chris Croome

Friday, 8 February 2002

• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page David Woolley
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Al Gilman
• RE: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• RE: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Jon Hanna
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Joel Ward
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• Re: Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Thorny one - representing greek letters and formulae in an english page Steve Carter
• Mercury Interactive and HiSoftware invite you to a FREE online seminar on best practices for testing your site for 100 percent W3C and Section 508 accessibility. Dana Louise Simberkoff

Thursday, 7 February 2002

• special notice:Bookshare Public Beta David Poehlman

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

• JAWS 4.01 and Images as Text for Headings Snyder, Ethan [JJCUS]
• table markup Jason Megginson
• Re: CSS Questions Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Scrollable tables KOROTNICKI, Malessa
• Re: CSS Questions David Woolley

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

• Re: CSS Questions Kynn Bartlett
• Re: CSS Questions David Woolley
• RE: Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1 Audrey J. Gorman
• Re: CSS Questions Kynn Bartlett
• Fw: Java Access Bridge 1.0.2 released; Java Accessibility Helper 0.5 available David Poehlman
• RE: CSS Questions Tom James
• RE: CSS Questions SHARPE, Ian
• RE: CSS Questions Jon Hanna
• CSS Questions SHARPE, Ian

Monday, 4 February 2002

• media: speech vendors shout for standards: David Poehlman
• web:Fw: How Do You Use Linux?: online banking: David Poehlman
• Re: Images in Headers iris

Saturday, 2 February 2002

• RE: Client Side vs. Server Side Image Maps Al Gilman
• Re: Images in Headers David Woolley
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines David Woolley
• RE: Client Side vs. Server Side Image Maps Nick Kew
• Re: Images in Headers Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data David Woolley
• Re: Images in Headers David Woolley
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data goliver@accease.com

Friday, 1 February 2002

• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data David Poehlman
• Re: Images in Headers David Woolley
• RE: Client Side vs. Server Side Image Maps Al Gilman
• Re: Images in Headers B.K. DeLong
• RE: Jaws & Headers; was: Images in Headers Patrick Burke
• Re: Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Images in Headers Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Images in Headers Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Images in Headers B.K. DeLong
• RE: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Jim Thatcher
• Re: Images in Headers Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Images in Headers Jason Megginson
• Images in Headers RUST Randal
• RE: Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1 Simon White
• RE: Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1 RUST Randal
• Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1 Ken Reader
• RE: Client Side vs. Server Side Image Maps Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Client Side vs. Server Side Image Maps Nick Kew
• RE: Client Side vs. Server Side Image Maps Jon Hanna
• Re: Screen Readers and Microsoft Access Access Systems
• RE: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Hy Cohen

Thursday, 31 January 2002

• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes David Woolley
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes David Poehlman
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines David Woolley
• Re: Screen Readers and Microsoft Access Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Patrick Burke
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Charles F. Munat
• RE: Scrollable tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Al Gilman
• RE: Listserv Settings; was: Navigation bars with dynamic content Patrick Burke
• Author proposes, user disposes -- it takes both to make it work Al Gilman
• RE: FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms Al Gilman
• Re: Screen Readers and Microsoft Access Lubow Scott
• Re: Screen Readers and Microsoft Access Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Joel Ward
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Joel Ward
• RE: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Jason Megginson
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• RE: FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms RUST Randal
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Joel Ward
• RE: FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content Harry Woodrow
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content RUST Randal
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content Harry Woodrow
• Screen Readers and Microsoft Access Lubow Scott
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes David Poehlman
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content Harry Woodrow
• RE: FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms RUST Randal
• FAQ Re: Mixing Tables and Forms Al Gilman
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content Harry Woodrow
• Mixing Tables and Forms RUST Randal
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• RE: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Jon Hanna
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Jim Byrne
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Jouni Heikniemi
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Steve Carter
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data: alt attributes Jim Byrne
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Jim Byrne
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines David Woolley
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines Access Systems

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content David Woolley
• Re: Scrollable tables David Woolley
• Re: Scrollable tables David Woolley
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines goliver@accease.com
• UNIX Accessibility series at CSUN, March 21, 2002 Phillip Pi
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Good UI Design for Readers [PS: accesskey] Al Gilman
• Re: Good UI Design for Readers Al Gilman
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Jouni Heikniemi
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• Good UI Design for Readers Andy J. W. Affleck
• Re: This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? Jim Ley
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Jim Ley
• RE: UK Government Web Guidelines Simon White
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data David Poehlman
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines Chris Croome
• RE: UK Government Web Guidelines Harry Woodrow
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Jim Byrne
• RE: Scrollable tables SHARPE, Ian
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines Chris Croome
• Re: Creating accessible tables for layout and data Jouni Heikniemi
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: UK Government Web Guidelines Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Scrollable tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: UK Government Web Guidelines Harry Woodrow
• RE: UK Government Web Guidelines Simon White
• Re: UK Government Web Guidelines Tom Gilder
• Scrollable tables SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Charles F. Munat
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Denise Wood
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Harry Woodrow
• UK Government Web Guidelines goliver@accease.com

Tuesday, 29 January 2002

• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• Fw: [webwatch] Creating accessible tables for layout and data David Poehlman
• Creating accessible tables for layout and data Jim Byrne
• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Denise Wood
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: sign up security: Harry Woodrow
• Re: sign up security: Kelly Ford
• Re: sign up security: David Poehlman
• RE: Navigation bars with dynamic content SHARPE, Ian
• Re: sign up security: Steve Carter
• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Jim Ley
• RE: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Scarlett Julian (ED)

Monday, 28 January 2002

• Re: This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? David Woolley
• Re: sign up security: David Woolley

Tuesday, 29 January 2002

• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Harry Woodrow

Monday, 28 January 2002

• Re: This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Nick Kew
• Re: This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? Nick Kew
• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Steven McCaffrey
• Re: sign up security: David Poehlman
• Re: sign up security: Marti McCuller
• Re: multi-language <alt=""> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: sign up security: Steve Carter
• Re: sign up security: Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Yahoogroups and blind users - sorry for being a bit off topi c Steve Carter
• Re: sign up security: Marti McCuller
• Re: This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Yahoogroups and blind users - sorry for being a bit off topi c David Poehlman
• Re: sign up security: Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Yahoogroups and blind users - sorry for being a bit off topi c Steve Carter
• This is obvious to me. Is anybody doing work on it? Steve Carter
• Re: Yahoogroups and blind users - sorry for being a bit off topi c David Poehlman
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Steve Carter
• Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Jim Ley
• Re: Navigation bars with dynamic content Jim Ley
• RE: Yahoogroups and blind users - sorry for being a bit off topi c Helle Bjarnø
• Re: sign up security: David Poehlman
• Re: sign up security: Steve Carter
• Navigation bars with dynamic content Sylvie Duchateau
• sign up security: David Poehlman
• RE: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Ken Reader
• accessibility and content management systems [was: Re: PHP] Chris Croome
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Tom Gilder

Sunday, 27 January 2002

• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Microsoft .NET and Accessibility Jim Ley
• Microsoft .NET and Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Charles F. Munat
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> David Woolley

Saturday, 26 January 2002

• Re: PHP kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Paul Koenig
• RE: no subject, no content: what to do? Danny Ayers
• Re: no subject, no content: what to do? Miraz Jordan
• policy on charging for plug-ins jonathan chetwynd
• Re: multi-language <alt=""> David Woolley
• multi-language <alt=""> jonathan chetwynd
• Re: no subject, no content: what to do? Marti McCuller
• Re: PHP David Woolley
• no subject, no content: what to do? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: PHP David Woolley
• Re: PHP Charles F. Munat
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Charles F. Munat

Friday, 25 January 2002

• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> David Woolley
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> David Woolley

Saturday, 26 January 2002

• Re: PHP Sarah Kuehnle

Friday, 25 January 2002

• Re: PHP Carol Foster

Saturday, 26 January 2002

• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Ineke van der Maat

Friday, 25 January 2002

• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• RE: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Jon Hanna
• Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Liz Roberts
• RE: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> Jon Hanna
• Overlapping text again SHARPE, Ian
• <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i> KOROTNICKI, Malessa
• RE: PHP Kynn Bartlett
• RE: PHP Danny Ayers
• RE: PHP David M. Clark

Thursday, 24 January 2002

• Participants Wanted Singh, Manik
• Re: PHP Charles F. Munat
• Re: access to plug-ins David Woolley
• Re: PHP David Woolley
• Re: access to plug-ins Joel Ward
• Re: PHP Carol Foster
• RE: access to plug-ins Simon White
• access to plug-ins Jason Megginson
• FW: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site EDixon@rnib.org.uk
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-sit e Chris Croome

Wednesday, 23 January 2002

• Book: Do You Remember the Color Blue? Harvey Bingham
• Ann: WCAG Accessibility testing in Page Valet Nick Kew
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-sit e kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• RE: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-sit e Al Gilman
• Re: Navigation Strategy Steven McCaffrey
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-sit e Chris Croome
• RE: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-sit e David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons David Woolley
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site David Woolley
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site David Woolley
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons David Woolley
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons David Woolley
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site Al Gilman
• Re: PHP Kynn Bartlett
• Re: PHP Sarah Kuehnle
• PHP Ken Reader
• Navigation Strategy Singh, Manik
• RE: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site Dan Billingsley
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site Chris Croome
• Re: advice sought for design of a search facility for a sub-site EDixon@rnib.org.uk
• HiSoftware and Microsoft invite you to a FREE seminar on"Achieving and Maintaining an Accessible Web site in compliance with Section 508-Accessibility through the Web project life cycle" Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative Jim Byrne
• RE: DHTML and HTA SHARPE, Ian
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons David Woolley
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative David Woolley
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons jonathan chetwynd
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons David Woolley

Monday, 21 January 2002

• Re: background-image in CSS David Woolley

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• RE: onmouseover-touchscreen-pda Al Gilman

Monday, 21 January 2002

• DHTML and HTA Denise Wood
• FW: Advice sought about DTML and HTA Denise Wood
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative goliver@accease.com
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative David Poehlman
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 Jim Ley
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative Kynn Bartlett
• RE: How closely does Windows narrator simulate JAWS Kynn Bartlett
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: [htmldesigners] Generic Icons David Poehlman
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative Jon Hanna
• mule & emacspeak - slightly off topic jonathan chetwynd
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 jonathan chetwynd
• Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative Jim Byrne
• RE: onmouseover-touchscreen-pda Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: onmouseover-touchscreen-pda SHARPE, Ian
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 Jim Ley
• Re: small generalisation in an existing CSS2 attribute was Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. Charles McCathieNevile
• re: How closely does Windows narrator simulate JAWS David Poehlman
• Re: background-image in CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: small generalisation in an existing CSS2 attribute was Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Geoff Deering
• RE: How closely does Windows narrator simulate JAWS Ken Reader
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Poehlman
• Re: announcement: New JAWS for windows upgrade for authorized users and demo released: Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Geoff Deering
• Re: How closely does Windows narrator simulate JAWS jame_sj@yahoo.com
• Re: background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Review of the 2002 Olympics site Bill LaPlant

Sunday, 20 January 2002

• /> in head of xhtml page being rendered by emacs-w3 jonathan chetwynd
• Re: (re:steal this post) David Woolley

Monday, 21 January 2002

• (re:steal this post) Ineke van der Maat

Sunday, 20 January 2002

• Re: background-image in CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Steal this post David Woolley

Saturday, 19 January 2002

• New Features in JAWS 4.01 (direct URL) Al Gilman
• Re: announcement: New JAWS for windows upgrade for aut Joe Clark
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat

Sunday, 20 January 2002

• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Hoehnermusikfan

Saturday, 19 January 2002

• Re: Review of the 2002 Olympics site Charles F. Munat
• Re: Different faces of the same issue David Poehlman
• Re: media:Fw: Accessible Websites -- Making Sure That All Your Visitors Can Access All Your Site David Woolley
• Re: media:Fw: Accessible Websites -- Making Sure That All Your Visitors Can Access All Your Site Jim Ley
• announcement: New JAWS for windows upgrade for authorized users and demo released: David Poehlman
• Re: Review of the 2002 Olympics site David Woolley
• Re: media:Fw: Accessible Websites -- Making Sure That All Your Visitors Can Access All Your Site David Woolley
• small generalisation in an existing CSS2 attribute was Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. jonathan chetwynd
• Review of the 2002 Olympics site Geoff Deering
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS - PRACTICAL APPLICATION Al Gilman
• media:Fw: Accessible Websites -- Making Sure That All Your Visitors Can Access All Your Site David Poehlman
• Different faces of the same issue Harry Woodrow
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• Re: background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS) Charles F. Munat
• Re: background-image in CSS Access Systems
• Re: onmouseover-touchscreen-pda Access Systems
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Take a break [was: Re: The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS)] Judy Brewer
• Re: background-image in CSS David Woolley
• Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. David Woolley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Woolley
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Kynn Bartlett
• Re: The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS) Access Systems

Saturday, 19 January 2002

• Fw: background-image in CSS Ineke van der Maat

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS - PRACTICAL APPLICATION RUST Randal
• RE: The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS) Access Systems
• RE: The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS) Kynn Bartlett
• RE: The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS) Harry Woodrow
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Kynn Bartlett
• The Nonsense Rhetoric of Web Accessibility (was: background-image in CSS) Kynn Bartlett
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: background-image in CSS David Poehlman
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles F. Munat
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Jon Hanna
• Accessibility of 2002 Olympics site once again publicly questioned B.K. DeLong
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: background-image in CSS Joel Ward
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Jon Hanna
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Jon Hanna
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Jim Ley
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• Re: onmouseover-touchscreen-pda Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - discrimanation?! Access Systems
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• Re: background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• onmouseover-touchscreen-pda jonathan chetwynd
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• RE: WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• Re: WA - background-image in CSS Access Systems
• Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. Charles McCathieNevile
• WA - background-image in CSS RUST Randal
• Re: background-image in CSS Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. David Woolley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Woolley
• Re: FW: Posting XML David Woolley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles F. Munat
• RE: background-image in CSS Harry Woodrow
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles F. Munat
• RE: img alt text, links and titles Harry Woodrow
• Re: background-image in CSS Ineke van der Maat

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Jim Ley
• Re: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• RE: img alt text, links and titles Kynn Bartlett
• Re: background-image in CSS Kynn Bartlett
• RE: img alt text, links and titles Audrey J. Gorman

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Re: background-image in CSS Ineke van der Maat

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: object : when is support arriving, and more. Jim Ley
• RE: background-image in CSS Kynn Bartlett
• object : when is support arriving, and more. jonathan chetwynd
• Re: img alt text, links and titles jonathan chetwynd
• RE: background-image in CSS Jason Megginson
• RE: background-image in CSS Kynn Bartlett
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Patrick Burke
• Re: background-image in CSS Steve Brumbaugh
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Re: img alt text, links and titles Ineke van der Maat

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: img alt text, links and titles Patrick Burke
• Re: background-image in CSS Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Re: background-image in CSS Hoehnermusikfan

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles F. Munat
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles F. Munat
• RE: background-image in CSS Jon Hanna
• background-image in CSS Jason Megginson
• Re: Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: img alt text, links and titles kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: img alt text, links and titles kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Usefulness of the WAI-IG List Archive, Part II karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• Re: ferreting out the meaning of horizontal rules [was: RE: Bobby inaccuracy?] Kelly Ford
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: img alt text, links and titles Jon Hanna
• RE: Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Volume of mail Harry Woodrow
• Disability Access and Banking (includes web) Harry Woodrow
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles F. Munat
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Jim Ley
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Jim Ley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Woolley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: (WA) Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• Those multi-line URLs karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Usefulness of the WAI-IG List Archive, Part II karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• Usefulness of the WAI-IG List Archive karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• final I hope:Fw: Re: Putting "blind-L" In Subject Line David Poehlman
• Re: (WA) Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re:(WA) Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• Re: img alt text, links and titles jonathan chetwynd
• Re:(WA) Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• Re:(WA) Legal requirements Access Systems
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics BATEMAN,LEE (HP-Boise,ex1)
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: img alt text, links and titles kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: img alt text, links and titles kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: img alt text, links and titles David Poehlman
• further correction:Fw: Re: getting messages with Blind-L in subject David Poehlman
• Positioning + screen resolution + monitor size Laurie Davis-Covin
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Steve Brumbaugh
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: img alt text, links and titles Ineke van der Maat

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• AW: img alt text, links and titles Jan Eric Hellbusch

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: img alt text, links and titles Hoehnermusikfan

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• Re: RE: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• RE: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: Form design - best practice SHARPE, Ian
• RE: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: Form design - best practice Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Form design - best practice SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Timed Text work Daniel Dardailler
• Re: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• Form design - best practice SHARPE, Ian
• Re: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• RE: Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• Re:(WA) suggestion for list filtering:Fw: getting messages with Blind-L in subject Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• correction:Fw: Re: getting messages with Blind-L in subject David Poehlman
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• suggestion for list filtering:Fw: getting messages with Blind-L in subject David Poehlman
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: img alt text, links and titles/ Bobby inaccuracy Ineke van der Maat
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Jim Ley
• AW: img alt text, links and titles Jan Eric Hellbusch
• RE: img alt text, links and titles Jon Hanna
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Jim Ley
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile
• Timed Text work Daniel Dardailler
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Geoff Deering
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: img alt text, links and titles kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

Tuesday, 15 January 2002

• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Woolley

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• Re: ferreting out the meaning of horizontal rules [was: RE: Bobby inaccuracy?] Charles F. Munat
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Chris Croome
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Denise Wood
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Rebecca Cox
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• RE: List or Newsgroups? (RE: Help Unsubscribing) Harry Woodrow
• Re: ferreting out the meaning of horizontal rules [was: RE: Bobby inaccuracy?] Chris Croome
• Re: List or Newsgroups? (RE: Help Unsubscribing) Al Gilman
• Re: ferreting out the meaning of horizontal rules [was: RE: Bobby inaccuracy?] Charles F. Munat

Tuesday, 15 January 2002

• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? Charles F. Munat
• Re: List or Newsgroups? (RE: Help Unsubscribing) Access Systems
• Re: List or Newsgroups? (RE: Help Unsubscribing) Nick Kew
• Re: Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) David Woolley
• Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Nick Kew
• Re: List or Newsgroups? (RE: Help Unsubscribing) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: forms problem Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Alt Text (Was: Re: Bobby inaccuracy?) Al Gilman
• Filtering and Threading [was: Re: traffic on the list] Chris Croome
• Relative v absolute units (was Bobby inaccuracy?) Rowan Smith
• Alt Text (Was: Re: Bobby inaccuracy?) Liz Roberts
• ferreting out the meaning of horizontal rules [was: RE: Bobby inaccuracy?] Al Gilman
• Re: img alt text, links and titles Charles McCathieNevile
• traffic on the list David Poehlman
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? BATEMAN,LEE (HP-Boise,ex1)
• Re: Overview of PDF accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? Steven McCaffrey
• Overview of PDF accessibility B.K. DeLong
• Re: Netscape David Poehlman
• RE: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk
• Obscure browsers was: Bobby inaccuracy? Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? David Poehlman
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Jim Ley
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? David Poehlman
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Poehlman
• RE: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Jon Hanna
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? David Poehlman
• Re: forms problem Jim Ley
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Al Gilman
• RE: Netscape Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: longdesc Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: forms problem Al Gilman
• RE: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Jim Ley
• AW: Bobby inaccuracy? Jan Eric Hellbusch
• img alt text, links and titles Chris Croome
• RE: on the future: was: Re: forms problem Harry Woodrow
• longdesc Jason Megginson
• on the future: was: Re: forms problem David Poehlman
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: Netscape Harry Woodrow
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: forms problem David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk
• Re: Netscape Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Simon White
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: forms problem David Poehlman
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? David Poehlman
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Jon Hanna
• RE: forms problem DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: forms problem Jim Ley
• RE: forms problem Jon Hanna
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? David Poehlman
• Re: forms problem David Poehlman
• RE: Bobby inaccuracy? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: forms problem David Poehlman
• Re: Bobby inaccuracy? David Poehlman
• Bobby inaccuracy? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Netscape iris
• RE: forms problem DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: forms problem Harry Woodrow
• RE: forms problem DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: forms problem DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: forms problem DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• Re: Netscape David Woolley
• Re: AW: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: Netscape David Woolley
• Re: Help Unsubscribing Al Gilman
• Re: Large amount of mail - delete if not interetsed Leslie K. Yoder
• RE: Netscape KOROTNICKI, Malessa
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• Re: Netscape Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Martin Sloan
• Article: High-tech's disability mandate (CNET) Phillip Pi

Monday, 14 January 2002

• AW: forms problem Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: Netscape Chris Croome
• Re: Netscape David Poehlman
• RE: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Netscape Mike Scott
• Re: Netscape David Poehlman
• Re: forms problem David Woolley
• Re: Authority of developers David Woolley
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Re: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Netscape Access Systems
• Re: Netscape David Poehlman
• Re: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Netscape David Poehlman
• AW: Netscape Jan Eric Hellbusch
• RE: Netscape Mike Scott
• Re: Large amount of mail (was RE: Help Unsubscribing) - delete if not interetsed Patrick Burke
• RE: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• List or Newsgroups? (RE: Help Unsubscribing) Nick Kew
• Re: forms problem Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Netscape RUST Randal
• Re: Netscape Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Authority of developers Kynn Bartlett
• Netscape RUST Randal
• Large amount of mail (was RE: Help Unsubscribing) - delete if not interetsed Simon White
• RE: Help Unsubscribing Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: Help Unsubscribing BATEMAN,LEE (HP-Boise,ex1)
• Help Unsubscribing Brigan, Kell
• forms problem DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• Re: more CSS and tables * :-)) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools Charles McCathieNevile
• Authority of developers Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Simon White
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Cynthia Waddell
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• Re: Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools Kynn Bartlett
• FWD: Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools Denise Wood
• Re: Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools Nick Kew
• RE: Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools David M. Clark
• Free, Multi-Platform Accessibility Analysis Tools Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Cynthia Waddell

Sunday, 13 January 2002

• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• Re: tips: trimming search URLs David Poehlman
• Re: tips: trimming search URLs Vadim Plessky
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Woolley
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Denise Wood
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• Legal requirements RE: statistics Denise Wood
• media:Fw: Simputer: Ultra-cheap Linux laptop David Poehlman
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• announcement:Fw: There aren't enough of us for business to bother with us! David Poehlman

Saturday, 12 January 2002

• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• mail clients [Re: more CSS and tables * :-))] Vadim Plessky
• QED: examples of excellence jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: more CSS and tables * :-)) Access Systems
• RE: more CSS and tables * :-)) Harry Woodrow
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Denise Wood
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Woolley
• Re: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? David Woolley

Friday, 11 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables * :-)) Access Systems

Saturday, 12 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables * :-)) Vadim Plessky

Friday, 11 January 2002

• tips: trimming search URLs Al Gilman
• RE: request for a visit Access Systems
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Cynthia Waddell
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Cynthia Waddell
• Re: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-accessible sites? David Poehlman
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• Re: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-accessible sites? Pat Byrne
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics Simon White
• RE: info request:Fw: Animation for Access Simon White
• Re: Legal requirements RE: statistics David Poehlman
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics RUST Randal
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jim Ley
• Legal requirements RE: statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• Accessibility Monitoring Service Available Danielle Martel
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? Simon White
• RE: info request:Fw: Animation for Access Simon White
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? Steven McCaffrey
• info request:Fw: Animation for Access David Poehlman
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jim Ley
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? Denise Wood
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? Danielle Martel
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? Simon White
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? SHARPE, Ian
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? RUST Randal
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-acce ssible sites? SHARPE, Ian
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-accessible sites? Simon White
• RE: statistics - for differences between accessible and non-accessible sites? Ken Reader
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Carol Foster
• statistics - for differences between accessible and non-accessible sites? Pat Byrne
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jim Ley
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jim Ley
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: Data capture software for screen readers SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Woolley
• RE: orinoco was Re: network HOWTO (How about VNC?) Phillip Pi
• RE: more CSS and tables Access Systems
• RE: Blind Users and Web Comics Harry Woodrow
• RE: orinoco was Re: network HOWTO Harry Woodrow
• RE: more CSS and tables Harry Woodrow
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Woolley

Thursday, 10 January 2002

• Re: Steal this post David Woolley
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Woolley
• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics Patrick Burke

Friday, 11 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky

Thursday, 10 January 2002

• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Woolley
• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics David Woolley
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Patrick Burke
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Geoff Deering
• Re: Steal this post Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: FW: Blind Users and Web Comics Al Gilman
• Re: another dumb question: flash plugins Jim Ley
• another dumb question: flash plugins jonathan chetwynd
• Data capture software for screen readers Swierenga, Sarah J. (LNG)
• Unix Resources Lubow Scott
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jim Ley
• FW: Blind Users and Web Comics Brigan, Kell
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Carol Foster
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jim Ley
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Jon Hanna
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing RUST Randal
• RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing RUST Randal
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Carol Foster
• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics Steven McCaffrey
• RE: Fonts overlapping SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Fonts overlapping Jon Hanna
• Fonts overlapping SHARPE, Ian
• Steal this post Charles F. Munat
• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics Kelly Ford
• Re: Software Quality Assurance (SQA) and Web Accessibilty? Phillip Pi
• Re: Software Quality Assurance (SQA) and Web Accessibilty? Nick Kew
• Re: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing David Poehlman
• Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing Geoff Deering
• Software Quality Assurance (SQA) and Web Accessibilty? Phillip Pi

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics (Dr. Fun?) Phillip Pi
• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics Patrick Burke
• Re: Blind Users and Web Comics David Poehlman
• Blind Users and Web Comics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Pixels vs Points as a unit for sizes Liz Roberts
• Re: more CSS and tables Charles F. Munat
• Re: more CSS and tables Charles F. Munat
• Re: Pixels vs Points as a unit for sizes Charles F. Munat
• more CSS and tables Denise Wood
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• Re: FAQ hey guys who's working on this? should i take a minute? Al Gilman
• RE: Pixels vs Points as a unit for sizes Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Pixels vs Points as a unit for sizes DERRICK, Monique

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables Hoehnermusikfan

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables David Woolley
• Re: more CSS and tables David Woolley
• Re: SV: Cascading menus Access Systems
• Re: SV: Cascading menus jonathan chetwynd
• FAQ hey guys who's working on this? should i take a minute? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• RE: more CSS and tables Jon Hanna
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• Re: Does Content-Language in HTTP headers over rule <html lang="en">? Chris Croome
• Does Content-Language in HTTP headers over rule <html lang="en">? Chris Croome
• RE: Cascading menus Scarlett Julian (ED)
• SV: Cascading menus Susie Christensen
• RE: Cascading menus Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Cascading menus Susie Christensen
• Re: more CSS and tables David Woolley

Monday, 7 January 2002

• Re: Updated Bobby David Woolley
• Re: more CSS and tables David Woolley

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Pixels vs Points as a unit for sizes Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: speech readers Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Support for xml:lang and lang in Home Page Reader Chris Croome
• Re: more CSS and tables Denise Wood
• Re: more CSS and tables Denise Wood
• Re: more CSS and tables Denise Wood

Monday, 7 January 2002

• Support for xml:lang and lang in Home Page Reader Kynn Bartlett
• Re: speech readers David Poehlman
• Fw: Renewed Call for Bookshare.org Beta Testers David Poehlman
• Re: Updated Bobby David Woolley
• Re: speech readers Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: drop downs and on change events Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• RE: more CSS and tables RUST Randal
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• Re: more CSS and tables Chris Croome
• Re: Updated Bobby Chris Croome
• Online Accessible Web Design Course: Space Still Open Kynn Bartlett
• media:a good article about the w3c: David Poehlman

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables Hoehnermusikfan

Monday, 7 January 2002

• RE: drop downs and on change events Dan Billingsley
• speech readers RUST Randal
• drop downs and on change events John Morse
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• Re: more CSS and tables David Woolley
• Re: Updated Bobby David Woolley
• Re: more CSS and tables Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 6 January 2002

• RE: more CSS and tables Kynn Bartlett
• RE: more CSS and tables Jim Thatcher

Monday, 7 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky
• Re: more CSS and tables Vadim Plessky

Sunday, 6 January 2002

• Re: more CSS and tables Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: more CSS and tables Kynn Bartlett
• Re: feedback:Fw: Drop Down Menus Jim Ley
• Re: more CSS and tables Denise Wood
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? David Woolley
• Re: charset enquiry David Woolley
• Re: more CSS and tables David Woolley
• RE: more CSS and tables Denise Wood
• Mobile phones Re: more CSS and tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: more CSS and tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: more CSS and tables Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 5 January 2002

• RE: more CSS and tables Michael R. Burks
• Re: more CSS and tables Kynn Bartlett
• more CSS and tables Joe Clark
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Ineke van der Maat
• more CSS and tables Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 4 January 2002

• feedback:Fw: Drop Down Menus David Poehlman
• Re: info:Fw: NEW: Quality Assurance (qa) Nick Kew
• info:Fw: NEW: Quality Assurance (qa) David Poehlman

Thursday, 3 January 2002

• Re: charset enquiry Access Systems
• Re: charset enquiry Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• RE: charset enquiry Jon Hanna
• Re: charset enquiry Access Systems

Saturday, 22 December 2001

• Re: Updated Bobby Chris Croome
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Chris Croome

Thursday, 3 January 2002

• Re: test no mail since 31/12/01 Chris Croome
• Re: charset enquiry Chris Croome
• charset enquiry Scarlett Julian (ED)
• test no mail since 31/12/01 jonathan chetwynd

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 20:06:16 UTC