- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:17:43 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 12:45 PM 2002-01-11 , Simon White wrote: > >http://www.google.com/search?num=50hl=en&lr=lang_en&q=%22designing%22+%22dy slexia%22+webbtnG=Google+Search > His post was excellent. This is not a complaint. He just happened to provide a good example. Can I step up on a soap box and still speak softly? I was able to reproduce his search with the URL spelled as http://www.google.com/search?q=designing+dyslexia There are some people still cutting and pasting URLs to their browser to follow links that they are passed in email. The automation of URL following from email messages is not universal. Not always implemented, not always free from breakage where implemented. Had a recent repeat on WebWatch of the failure scenario where someone got an URL in an email that wrapped, broke, and they didn't understand why when they tried to follow it they got a 404. The pieces were all there but try to see that in your screen reader. Since passing along Google search URLs is IMHO a good thing, and URLs that wrap over to the next line are a risky thing, I thought I would point out this idea, because they are often over one line as held in your browser and can often be emulated by something much shorter. If you wish a different language you will need to add the language parameter back in. Etc. For what it's worth. Al
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 17:18:00 UTC