W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Using Form Elements for Pages only Intended for Printing

From: Patrick Burke <burke@ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:50:05 -0800
Message-Id: <>
To: gdeering@acslink.net.au, Carol Foster <c.foster@umassp.edu>
Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
As a blind person I would say that the form element version is much friendlier.

If underscore or other characters are used to mark the input fields, then I 
(or anyone really) has to copy the page to a word processor (possibly 
losing original formatting), then fill in the ___ sections (& hope that 
doesn't mess up the formatting beyond recognition).

The version with form markup would let me move quickly and accurately among 
the input fields, & their location on the page would be maintained 
automatically. So, other than the possibility of entering 3 pages of text 
into an edit field, the printout would match the original form more 
exactly. Which is, as I understand it, what people dealing with print forms 

So, I would vote in favor of forms markup, with a statement at the 
beginning that the form is for printing purposes and cannot be submitted 


At 01:34 PM 1/10/02, Geoff Deering wrote:
>What I am really asking is, is
>Name: _________________________________
>Address: _______________________________
>Etc the better markup for print?
>The question is; Does using form elements immediately imply an
>electronically submittable form?  And if so, is it best to use the above
>Geoff Deering
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 16:52:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:06 UTC