- From: Simon White <simon.white@jkd.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:28:43 -0000
- To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
There are also those of us who have scripting turned off on occasion rather than all the time. That has got to skew the figures somewhat... -----Original Message----- From: David Woolley [mailto:david@djwhome.demon.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 22:01 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are > (for example, the 13% of people who disable scripts even though the browser > is capable of running scripts) I'd be interested in a source for this. I'm one of them, but I reckon that I'm the only one in my company, making the figure about 1.6%, and I would have thought that in the mass market the figure was lower. It would be rather telling if true, given the number of even blue chip sites (latest I found was KPMG) that blank screen without scripting, and the even greater number that are un-navigable without it. Most businesses assume that 99% of the people dumb enough to do business with them have scripting on. Maybe the people with scripting off either ignore advertising or can't afford to buy. _____________________________________________________________________ VirusChecked by the Incepta Group plc _____________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 04:28:44 UTC