- From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:13:52 +0800
- To: <kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com>, "Martin Sloan" <martin.sloan@orange.net>
- Cc: "'Kynn Bartlett'" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "'Denise Wood'" <Denise_Wood@operamail.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, <charles@w3.org>
Kynn asked why arent more lawsuits being filed. My answer would be at least in Australia because Law Suits are considered last resorts. The first step would be a long process of concilliation probably with the assistance of HREOC and resort to the court is only as a last resort. I would be almost certain that this has occured in more than just the SOCOG and the companies have done the right thing without legal action being needed. It would appear that to some extent this process has happened in education in the US too but not being there I cannot be definite about that. Australia does not have a history of the huge damages claims that the US seems to make so court action is not generally performed through thoughts of profit so ambulance chasing is not a feature here. Laws only provide the underpinning for a society's behavior they are generally not the main reason for the behavior of individuals in society but help to protect society when members will not behave in acceptible fashions. I do not generally go round punching people, not because there is a law but because it is not right to do so. Sadly some members of society seem to ignore the moral reasons and the legal reasons and need the courts to deal with them. There would also be a larger section of society that the law provides at least some deterent from performing the action. THe law should not have to be used to stop discrimination but may provide an extra reason to do so. Harry WOodrow - Then why aren't more lawsuits being filed? Is there a shortage of ambulance chasing lawyers or something? --Kynn PS: To be clear on where I stand -- of course I am for accessibility, but that doesn't mean that I believe that all arguments made for accessibility are necessarily correct or even useful. Perhaps it's a uniquely American perspective -- the idea that the government should NOT necessarily be required to get involved in every possible aspect of regulation. Maybe it's a futile hope; I am sure that thanks to logic like that which you're espousing now, communications media such as the Web or discussion lists will quickly, within a few decades, be legislated into worthlessness. Nonetheless, I continue to cling to my naive belief that education and social responsibility may solve this problem -before- the governments of the world legislate expression on the web.
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 03:15:09 UTC