W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: orinoco was Re: network HOWTO

From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:06:47 +0800
To: "jonathan chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Have you thought of using VMware...It seems possible to actually have
multiple virtual machines running on one good box and even have these
networked.  Of course this only applies with Intel but that would generally
just mean a peer to peer network connection to the Mac.  May be better to
upgrade the memory and have it all on one box than multiple low spec

Harry Woodrow

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of jonathan chetwynd
Sent: Sunday, 30 December 2001 3:16 AM
To: jonathan chetwynd
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: orinoco was Re: network HOWTO

has anyone used orinoco wireless lan?
it would seem it might be a painless way to connect linux, apple and ms
for browsing.
anyone have a (simple) alternative, especially a decent HOWTO?


jonathan chetwynd wrote:

> I've never run an online network.
> It is possible that I'll want to run linux, apple,and ms simultaneously
> on three machines, to check and beta test site development.
> Have you seen a good and simple HOWTO for setting up a decent
> accessibility workstation such as I propose?
> I can currently check about 20 browsers, in a matter of minutes, however
> it involves a reboot, and no apples.
> I don't want to get involved in samba, transferring files, etc, rather
> just be able to view pages at the same time. mind you I already seem to
> have enough problems with cache-ing....
> thanks


http://www.peepo.com "enjoy surfing the net"
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 22:07:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:06 UTC