- From: <kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 07:53:17 -0800 (PST)
- To: Malessa.Korotnicki@qed.qld.gov.au (KOROTNICKI, Malessa)
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org ('w3c-wai-ig@w3.org')
Mal wrote: > 1. I know that the strong and em give differing emphasis to the contents > their applied to, but it is incorrect to nest them? No, it's not incorrect. > Does the nesting create an even stronger emphasis than just the strong? Presumably that's what it means, but I can't see how it would matter much. It does make certain parts of an already strong-or-em sentence stand out, of course. > If it was nested the other way, em within strong, would that make no > difference? Shouldn't. > Also, > 2. Should I use strong or em for titles, like in a bibliography? Or, if the > title quite long - eg. 'Conviction with compassion: a report on freedom of > religion and belief' - would that be too much to wrap in an emphasising tag? > Should I just use <i>? There's no limit on what you can put in an <em> tag, but in my opinion it sounds like you are trying to use <em> to get a presentational effect rather than trying to show special emphasis on the title of the work. Therefore I suggest either <cite> or a <span> with an appropriate class to effect the styling. --Kynn
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 10:46:23 UTC