- From: Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:56:51 -0800
- To: <accessys@smart.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello Bob, Thanks for your reaction. I don't want to exclude anybody from seeing the effect. In netscape 4.7 you can't see it because the background-image does not exist at all. Due to broken -css interpretation, I used CSS to provide only the white background. Cheers Ineke > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Access Systems" <accessys@smart.net> > To: "Ineke van der Maat" <inekemaa@xs4all.nl> > Cc: "Harry Woodrow" <harrry@email.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:26 AM > Subject: Re: background-image in CSS > > > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ineke van der Maat wrote: > > > > > Hello Harry, > > > > > > Look at my poemsite http://home.zonnet.nl/ineke.maat > > > > > > I use for the whole site a very special background-image (it is part of a tree-image) only for getting an effect. The real > > > background of that page is white and the background-image has nothing to do with the content of that page....or am I > wrong????? > > > > don't people with screen readers have a right to the "effect" you think is > > usefull for some people but not others. Why the difference? Do you > > think that visually impaired folks cannot get an "effect" or that they > > don't deserve that "effect"?????? > > >
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 15:47:05 UTC