- From: B.K. DeLong <bkdelong@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:00:47 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 10:28 AM 02/01/2002 -0500, Randal Rust wrote:
>Personally, I don't this that images should be used for headers, unless you
>need a specific font. Then you could use the "alt" tag. Right?
The only reason there should be an image in a header is because it's part
of it, as Chaarls referenced. If you need a specific font, then you should
be using inline or externally referenced style. Such as:
p.header {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 110%;
text-decoration: underline;
}
The reference it with <p class="header"><img src="myimage.gif" alt="My
Image"></p>. Even Netscape 4.x handles most font-related styles at this point.
Just my $0.02.
--
B.K. DeLong
bkdelong@pobox.com
617.877.3271
http://www.brain-stream.com Play.
http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org Potter.
http://www.attrition.org Security.
http://www.artemisiabotanicals.com Herb.
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 10:58:20 UTC