RE: Accessible Flash

On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, RUST Randal wrote:

> >Yep, I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments, however, you 
> >would have thought that if those involved with accessibility 
> >had been asked then this kind of thing could have been avoided 
> >and the new Flash software would have been accessible to all - 
> ----------
> 
> I agree with you, I really do.  And I'm not saying that your comments
> weren't warranted either, I just wanted to remind people that more goes into
> 
> I just get tired of hearing people on the WAI list finding faults with
> everything, rather than trying to help find solutions.  If the people on

well this list I thought was to address the technical problems, that is
sometimes done by identifying the problems, has to be done first to find
the solutions. 

> this list worked harder to educate, rather than criticize, then I think
> accessibility would be taken more seriously.

believe me we (I) sure do

Bob
BTW the list sure is slow tonight, messages I post I don't see for 5-6
hours


   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob                       
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net       
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers       
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right 
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as
soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this
communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems.  Thanks

Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 22:15:04 UTC