- From: Michel Thouati <michel@lithium.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:15:09 -0800
- To: "Access Systems" <accessys@smart.net>
- Cc: "WAI (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi Bob- I can tell you about our products as an example. We architect in java but we serve most end-users on our customers' sites who use MS systems. We want to be compatible with everyone - but, to take a specific example, when we produce chat applets, how can we provide accessibility to every OS? As a young startup, we have a hard time just addressing the largest segment of the market... And, btw, we are opensource (Java/Linux)- but our users (who browse on our applets) are the ones who have a proprietary OS... Take care, Michel -----Original Message----- From: Access Systems [mailto:accessys@smart.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: Michel Thouati Cc: WAI (E-mail) Subject: RE: GW Micro Helps Make Macromedia Flash Content Accessible to People Who Are Blind On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Michel Thouati wrote: > Here the question is: > - should we expect that everyone who caters to a given clientele make > their product accessible for this clientele (and only this one)? and the > answer is probably yes, i.e.: depends, should a Sun system be accessible to Sun systems, yes but what about people coming in from outside to investigate Sun products. > - a site which works hard at making itself accessible to Mac users > should probably be expected to be made Mac accessible as well > - a site which only target MS users should probably only be expected to > provide accessibility to MS users. heck MS isn't even accessible to users of older MS systems > I think that it is also fine to expect progressivity in how accesibility > is reached - i.e. we should probably expect MS accessiblility to be > reached before Mac accessibility in the general case because of the > relative % of the target users. Don't you think that it makes sense? no it makes much more sense to build systems that can be used by everyone then move on to proprietary systems that have a system that has to be Paid to be entered (buying proprietary software or hardware) MS can use generic systems but MS systems cannot be used by generic systems, it is one way access, in to MS but nothing gets out > It's fine to be critical of profit - but without it there would be no > site at all... profit is fine, greedy monopolistic activities are not Bob ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# *#*#*# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems. Thanks
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 21:18:54 UTC