W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long]

From: David M. Clark <david@davidsaccess.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:04:24 -0500
To: "'Steve Carter'" <steve@juggler.net>, "'wai-ig list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002a01c1b3ce$2d2e52d0$3301a8c0@tb>

You are absolutely right, I do owe you an apology. I was out of line and
over the top.

My frustration comes from the on-going theme of commercialization of
accessibility. As a veteran of the field, I applaud you for being on
this list, asking the tough questions, and learning from others.

However, when you say:

> I'm being paid to educate.  I'm on this list to be educated, not

It is analogous to doctor claiming to be a seasoned professional (with
commensurate rates), while he/she is still completing his/her


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Carter
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:24 AM
To: wai-ig list
Subject: Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long]

Shut up david, I don't believe you really want answers to any of your
questions.  But you have raised a head of bile in me so I will discharge
with one answer.

> >(3) Meeting My Client's Self-Imposed Measuring-Stick (i.e. my client
> > has stated its pages will be WAI-AA compliant) while I can recommend
> > slackening of that stricture, it is still the policy at this time
and so
> > have to educate the authors accordingly.

> You educate or have TO BE EDUCATED?

I'm being paid to educate.  I'm on this list to be educated, not

Most of the participants have been extremely helpful.  You might say
were making accessibility accessible.

I'm going to pretend you were having a bad day and didn't mean to post
last one.  Hope our next encounter is more grown-up.

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2002 09:00:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:07 UTC