- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:09:28 -0500 (EST)
- To: Michelle Podd <mpodd@iqnetcom.com>
- cc: "WAI (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
It's the size of the letter "m" which is the widest letter in the latin alphabet (generally). There is a definition in the CSS specification (lucky, since that is where the thing is used a lot): http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/syndata.html#length-units That says "it is the font size". chaals On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Michelle Podd wrote: David, I've done a quick search through google and couldn't find what em stands for. I believe "e" stands for element but that's as close as I came. Here's the best description I could find from blooberry.com: Ems. A scaling factor relative to the value of the current element's 'font-size' property. If 'em's are used in the 'font-size' property for an element, the scaling factor is relative to the value of the 'font-size' property of the parent element. If this type of unit is specified for the root element of a document, the scaling factor should be relative to the browser default value for the property. michelle ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net> To: "Michelle Podd" <mpodd@iqnetcom.com> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text > so what does e m stand for? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michelle Podd" <mpodd@iqnetcom.com> > To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:21 AM > Subject: Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text > > > An em is a way to express a size value (for font, line-height or other > things) in a relative way as opposed to a fixed way. It allows the user > to > increase or decrease the fon't size through his browser. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net> > To: "Michelle Podd" <mpodd@iqnetcom.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:47 PM > Subject: Re: screen magnifiers and fragmented text > > > > what is an em? sorry to ask and I probably know but cannot put my > mind > > to it. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michelle Podd" <mpodd@iqnetcom.com> > > To: "WAI (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:31 PM > > Subject: screen magnifiers and fragmented text > > > > > > Anyone ever have text "fragment" when using a screen magnifier? Any > > ideas > > why that would happen? > > > > At www.accessdome.com/preview I'm using Verdana as a main body font. > The > > size is expressed in em's. I'm getting a feedback from a lady using > > Zoomtext > > Extra Level 2 on a new PC through IE6. She tells me that the software > > acts > > as a screen magnifier and a screen reader. On the magnification side, > > she > > says that the headings (which are Georgia font) enlarge just fine > while > > some > > (but not all) of the body text fragments and is hard to read when > > magnified. > > I asked her to look at the National Organization on Disability site > > > > > http://www.nod.org/cont/dsp_cont_loc_hme.cfm?locationId=12&locationNm=Ho > > me ) > > which I'm told is highly accessible. Her feedback was that the regular > > text > > enlarged properly but any link text was fragmented. > > > > My only guess is regarding the use of styles - the inheritance rule. > > Netscape 4.x has inheritance issues (among many many many other > problems > > but > > I won't go there). I've got a separate style sheet for Netscape > however > > in > > places where it doesn't listen to the font-size, I add a class to > force > > it. > > For example, I have a style applied to <p> and <td>. In my web page, I > > have > > a table. IE 5.x renders the font just fine but in Netscape, it ignored > > the > > size (it displayed the proper font-family however so go figure). So I > > add > > class="table" (which contain the same properties as my regular body > > font) > > to the table tag then most times, the font size displays properly in > > both > > IE5.x and Netscapte 4.x. Here's part of my netscape style sheet. The > > one > > for "everyone else" is exactly the same, only the values are > different. > > > > p, body > > { > > font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; > > font-size: .8em; > > color: #333333; > > } > > > > p > > {line-height: 1.1em;} > > > > .table > > { > > font-size: .8em; > > line-height: 1.1em; > > } > > > > td > > { > > font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; > > font-size: .8em; > > color: #333333; > > } > > > > So, do you think the fragmentation occurs because of a style being > > applied > > twice? > > > > Any assistance is appreciated, > > Michelle Podd > > Web Designer > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 15:09:30 UTC