- From: <Demonpenta2@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:11:17 EST
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <109.c9d04a7.29899145@aol.com>
In a message dated 1/30/02 6:53:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk writes: > name withheld for fear of Persecution Kinda pointless when its in your email, y'know.:-) Also...most ironic to me are the Home Office pages for the UK. In many cases, they flunk accessibility so badly I would hate to be David Blunkett if something happens where personally he has to know what they say, and is being hit by the press about it. Poor guy is going to get hurt badly when adaptive tech can't interpret the page the press is howling about. I mean, unless you've been to it yourself, how can you really answer questions, especially if its coming from the press? No staffer can brief someone as fully that they may as well have been there themselves. (Side thought: The UK as a whole doesn't seem like a disability-friendly place in many respects. Hell, when I had a relative over there on a business trip, he came back and said that it seemed like it's viciously HOSTILE to those with disabilities (I'm partially sighted, have been pondering doing foreign trips over summers while I'm in college, and just asked him to look at it for the hell of it). Wrong impression, or am I right?)
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 13:11:29 UTC