- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:01:52 -0500
- To: "Leslie K. Yoder" <lkyoder@pacbell.net>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
the answer to your two questions is that if you are putting a site up on the world wide web and people are browsing with images off no matter what the reason, there needs to be something for them to shoot bullets at so you are not being accessive at all. If the site owner does not wish for people to view their site with images off than naught needs doing. as for long desk and alt, alt is to present the image and long desc is to describe it but long desc is not sufficient so there should be a link for this or perhaps it can be done on the same page. Either way you slice it, what you end up with is if you put in a link, some people get anoyed but they can still access it and if you put it on the page, others and perhaps the same get anoyed but they can still access it but if you do neither, those not loading images will see a blank page unless you use long desc and they support it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leslie K. Yoder" <lkyoder@pacbell.net> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:34 PM Subject: another alt question I've read with great interest the discussion regarding the purpose and content of alt text. So far, the emphasis has been on images that are "decorative" or supplemental in some way to the main content of a page. My question is this: what if the images _are_ the content--for example, a photo gallery or artist's online portfolio? My guess is that long desc would be the way to go, but I'm not sure. I'm currently working up a site for a friend who is a graphic artist (mostly in the area of signage), and I've looked at several artists' pages in the process. I've found, for the most part, that these pages don't concern themselves with accessibility for the blind, the reasoning apparently being that a blind user would have no interest in or use for graphic arts (a position that I, of course, find questionable). So I guess my question is really two-fold: Am I being excessive in insisting that even a site that's predominantly visual in its purpose be accessible? And what are your recommendations for alt and long desc content in this particular case? Thanks much Leslie Leslie K. Yoder lkyoder@pacbell.net
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 15:04:04 UTC