- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:51:39 -0800
- To: "agorman@megsinet.net" <agorman@megsinet.net>, "'David Poehlman'" <poehlman1@home.com>, "kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com" <kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: "kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com" <kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com>, Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>, "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 4:36 PM -0600 1/17/02, Audrey J. Gorman wrote: >The word "image" does not convey anything about the intellectual content of >the graphic thing that sits there. In other words, if you can't see the >image because of blindness or older hardware or software, "image" tells you >nothing useful. Not necessarily, there may be some cases in which it's still useful. ;) --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201 Forthcoming: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 Hours
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 18:00:52 UTC