- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 18:30:33 -0500 (EST)
- To: Denise Wood <denise_wood@operamail.com>
- cc: Carol Foster <c.foster@umassp.edu>, <j.byrne@gcal.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Except that their definition of accessibility is "does it have a text-only interface" - there is nothing mentioned about whether there is support for authors to create content that is accessible, or whether anything more sophisticated than a text-only interface (for example the use of text equivalents for functions and images provided) is available. But a good resource anyway to start from. Cheers Charles On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Denise Wood wrote: For those of you who have expressed interest in information comparing different e-learning platforms I have come across another relevant site: http://www.c2t2.ca/landonline/evalapps.asp The structure used for the reviews is very comprehensive and there is a comprehensive review of WebCT 3.7 but the review on Blackboard is lacking in detail. Also appears to be an older version of Blackboard that has been reviewed. Several other e-learning platforms are reviewed at this site and well worth checking out and bookmarking to check for regular updates of the reviews. Sincerely Denise
Received on Sunday, 31 March 2002 18:30:53 UTC