W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics

From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:14:37 +0800
To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>, "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
(ii) AOL is undertaking steps to render the existing and future content of
the AOL-developed areas of the AOL- service largely accessible to the blind
by converting the content to a format compatible with screen reader
assistive technology, and intends to take many of those steps to coincide
with the release of the AOL 6.0 software; (iii) as to certain exceptions
(which the NFB acknowledges pose unusual technological difficulties),

Looks as if this applies to content to me.  This is from the document you

Harry Woodrow
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of David Poehlman
Sent: Saturday, 12 January 2002 10:53 AM
To: wai-ig list
Subject: RE: Legal requirements RE: statistics

I have taken another look at the original sources of information on this
issue of aol vs nfb and even though the discussions about it envolve the
web, I see no indication in the original sources that this is the case.
I have been maintaining that this is the case since the day I read the
filing which was the day it came out and if the agreement referenced
below is any indication, It still holds.  I am not an legal authority or
student so am bound to not interpret but only read what is there and I
have utmost respect for those who opperate in this sphere so pleae
enlighten me with something I can find as a source rather than a third
person discussion as to the involvement of the web in this action.  here
is the url to the final agreement.
you can read the other sources near by.

I agree with the fundamental thoughts expressed in this thread
concerning the reasons for moving forward with accessibility but I also
feel that it is important to keep our facts streight.  I appologize if I
am indeed incorrect but in my discussions with many over the period
since the filing, I have been told that this has nothing to do with the

Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
touching the internet
voice: 301.949.7599
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 23:15:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:06 UTC