- From: Martin Sloan <martin.sloan@orange.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 23:57:56 -0000
- To: "'Gavin Hardman'" <ghardman@zentropypartners.com>, "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi Gavin, If your intended audience is employees of the Web site provider then this will be covered by Part II of the DDA in the UK. This requires (in layman terms) that employers make reasonable adjustments to the working environment of their employees in order to overcome any accessibility problems. This arguably includes company intranets following the argument in the Australian case of SOCOG v Maguire and its (in *my* opinion) likely following by the UK courts when asked to rule on the question. The argument for reasonable adjustments etc is analgous to the requirements under Part III (Goods and Services), hence why I would argue that the same position would apply to reasonable adjustments for employment. If the intended audience is not employees-only, then it would most likely be termed the provision of a service under Part III and hence it is likely that an inaccessible site would be deemed a breach of the Act. The only exclusion that I could think of would be if it was for a private club (or possibly some parts of an educational institution's site until September this year when new legislation comes into force). The key is *who* your intended audience are. However, in 9 cases out of 10 I would say that there is a legal argument that the site *should* be accessible. If the site is an extranet (and by this I interpret as a closed network run by the company that clients can log into) then this will be part of the service that is being provided to the client. Therefore it comes under the provision of services (Part III) and should therefore be accessible. If you want to read more on the position in the UK try http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-2/sloan.html or http://www.dmag.org.uk/resources/dda.asp (a bit shorter!). martin. -- martin.sloan@orange.net Glasgow Graduate School of Law On Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:19 PM, Gavin Hardman [SMTP:ghardman@zentropypartners.com] wrote: > > Is there any legal requirement to have accessible web pages when the target > audience is not the public? > > > > Gavin Hardman > Senior Site Developer > Zentropy Partners Ltd > London > UK
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2002 19:02:46 UTC