- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 06:59:18 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> I think CSS1 should be given up on, since CSS2 supercedes it. The most I think what people mean when they say that CSS1 isn't implemented fully is that CSS1 features that are also in CSS2 are not yet implemented. > useful "feature" from CSS3 in my opinion is the idea of splitting it into > chunks so you can talk about what is and isn't supported in more sensible > terminology than just CSS1 vs CSS2. That would be desirabale, however I strongly suspect the subject of the thread I mentioned violates this principle and is just the selective implementation of certain visual presentation attributes (multi-column layouts, I think, in this case). Unfortunately, there is no legal force on browser developers to comply with conformance criteria.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 01:59:22 UTC