- From: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:02:46 -0500 (EST)
- To: kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
- cc: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>, Martin Sloan <martin.sloan@orange.net>, "'Kynn Bartlett'" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "'Harry Woodrow'" <harrry@email.com>, "'Denise Wood'" <Denise_Wood@operamail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com wrote:
> Charles wrote:
> > The matter of choice is of course important. If I choose to use something
> > broken, I can't expect people to make it work for me. But if my employer
> > tells me to use it, I can expect them to be responsible for making sure it
>
> A question would be whether or not an employer can be held in violation
> of workplace accomodation laws by not providing a UAAG-compliant web
> browser employees to use. Or at least one which comes closer than others.
is it possible under the "Reasonable accomodation" rule??
>
> In other words, can you sue your boss for giving you Netscape 4? Or
absolutely maybe!
> -should- you be able to?
????? not touching that
Bob
ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob
NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net
NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers
NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as
soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this
communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems. Thanks
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 15:00:26 UTC