- From: <kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:54:46 -0800 (PST)
- To: poehlman1@home.com (David Poehlman)
- Cc: kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com, inekemaa@xs4all.nl (Ineke van der Maat), chas@munat.com (Charles F. Munat), charles@w3.org (Charles McCathieNevile), w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
David Poehlman wrote: > let's put this another way. an alternative is an alternative > representatation. the word image does not stand for anything and you > must have written this particular speck that you point to because it > isn't anywhere else. Why do you say the word "image" does not stand for anything? How exactly are you able to say this with such certainty in all situations which may possibly arise? --Kynn
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:50:33 UTC