- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:38:01 -0800
- To: Jim Byrne <j.byrne@gcal.ac.uk>, W3c_Access <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 4:47 PM +0000 1/21/02, Jim Byrne wrote: >Users will enter a compliant page and then choose between HTML and Flash. if >they choose HTML they get a compliant site and if they choose Flash they >don't. The Flash site is considered to be 'the main site' - and will not be >compliant with W3c Accessibility Guidelines. It could be a nightmare from a maintenance standpoint, but if they are willing to (a) ensure that the HTML version is truly accessible (and not just a "text only" site), and (b) ensure that the content of both versions is kept up to date, then there's absolutely nothing wrong with this idea at all, and may be a great way to have your cake and eat it too. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201 Forthcoming: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 Hours
Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 13:55:11 UTC