W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1

From: Simon White <simon.white@jkd.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:02:23 -0000
Message-ID: <D1EFBFDCD178C24DA607A306D6E3A7114F71F3@URANUs>
To: "RUST Randal" <RRust@COVANSYS.com>, "W3c-Wai-Ig (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I might be wrong (and that has happened often) but I was under the impression that animation was fine if it could be turned off? In studies that I have seen by agencies that work with dyslexics, they actually like animations and they are a large proportion of the disabled community (numbering 5 million in the UK alone).

I think some clarification is needed.



-----Original Message-----
From: RUST Randal [mailto:RRust@COVANSYS.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 14:57
To: W3c-Wai-Ig (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Blinking images and Checkpoint 7.1

>>A flickering or flashing screen may cause seizures in users with
photosensitive epilepsy and content developers should thus avoid causing the
screen to flicker.


Not all animation causes flickering of the screen.  Images that rotate
quickly might, and should be avoided, but certainly not a smooth transition,
such as you are capable of with Flash animations (but that's another topic
altogether regarding accessibility).  


VirusChecked by the Incepta Group plc
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 10:02:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:07 UTC