public-owl-wg@w3.org from July 2008 by date

Thursday, 31 July 2008

• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Bijan Parsia
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Conrad Bock
• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Bijan Parsia
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Conrad Bock
• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Bijan Parsia
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Conrad Bock
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? Sandro Hawke
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Rinke Hoekstra
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-135 (noontologyheader): Should be able to import rdf serialized documents without ontology headers Boris Motik
• Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Ian Horrocks
• RE: day 1 minutes Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-136 (owl:members): Allow the use of owl:members with owl:AllDifferent OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? Michael Schneider
• Question: State of the DL-Semantics document Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-135 (noontologyheader): Should be able to import rdf serialized documents without ontology headers OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Peter Haase

Wednesday, 30 July 2008

• OWL 2 Metamodel Peter Haase
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Conrad Bock
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 29 July 2008

• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Jie Bao
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Sandro Hawke
• draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Boris Motik
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available Jie Bao
• Re: scribe system changes Evan Wallace
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Bijan Parsia
• scribe system changes Sandro Hawke
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Jie Bao
• Proposal for datatypes at 3F2F Boris Motik
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Evan Wallace
• Re: Data stuff Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Ian Horrocks
• Re: Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available Christine Golbreich
• profile names (some brainstorming) Sandro Hawke
• day 1 minutes Sandro Hawke

Monday, 28 July 2008

• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Bijan Parsia
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Bijan Parsia
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Jie Bao
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Bijan Parsia
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Jie Bao
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Evan Wallace
• Re: Data stuff Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Data stuff Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Data stuff Evan Wallace
• Re: Data stuff Bijan Parsia
• Re: Data stuff Deborah L. McGuinness
• Data stuff Bijan Parsia
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Bijan Parsia
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Ian Horrocks
• Re: Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available Jie Bao

Sunday, 27 July 2008

• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Sandro Hawke
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Ian Horrocks
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 26 July 2008

• Changes in Agenda for Boston F2F meeting Ian Horrocks

Friday, 25 July 2008

• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Evan Wallace
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Evan Wallace
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Alan Ruttenberg
• Fwd: Clinical terminologies to OWL Bijan Parsia
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Bijan Parsia
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Uli Sattler
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Bijan Parsia
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Deborah L. McGuinness
• Fwd: multilingual labels constraint in SKOS Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 24 July 2008

• ANN: OWLDiff 0.1 Petr Kremen
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Michael Smith
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Michael Smith
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Uli Sattler
• RE: An approach to xsd:dateTime Boris Motik
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Float and double in constants, but not descriptions (was Re: A summary of the proposal for a datatype system of OWL 2 (ISSUE-126)) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 23 July 2008

• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Evan Wallace
• RE: An approach to xsd:dateTime Boris Motik
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime Michael Smith
• Datetime datatype Bijan Parsia
• An approach to xsd:dateTime Michael Smith
• Float and double in constants, but not descriptions (was Re: A summary of the proposal for a datatype system of OWL 2 (ISSUE-126)) Michael Smith
• Resolution of ISSUE-125 Boris Motik
• update to Rich Annotations serialization proposal Alan Ruttenberg
• OWL Internationalized string - update Jie Bao
• ISSUE-134 (owl metamodel): Metamodel for OWL 2 OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Ivan Herman
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection Bijan Parsia
• new javascript for syntax selection Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 22 July 2008

• Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available Evan Wallace
• Agenda for OWL WG Teleconference 2008-07-23 Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Differences in current OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full Michael Schneider
• resending message on quick reference Deborah L. McGuinness

Monday, 21 July 2008

• owl:AllDifferent and owl:members Michael Schneider
• Re: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) Axel Polleres
• RE: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) Phillips, Addison
• Re: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) Axel Polleres
• [UFDTF] Minutes and next telecon Ian Horrocks
• [Accessibility] O vs. O' and Diagrams Bijan Parsia
• Re: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) Axel Polleres
• Re: Differences in current OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full Ian Horrocks

Sunday, 20 July 2008

• Agenda for F2F3 (Cambridge, MA, 28-29 July 2008) Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 19 July 2008

• Differences in current OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full Michael Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ian Horrocks
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman

Friday, 18 July 2008

• ISSUE-125 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ian Horrocks
• RE: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) Phillips, Addison
• Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) Ivan Herman
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• Re: OWL 2 Profiles and Horn-SHIQ Ian Horrocks
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ian Horrocks
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Ivan Herman
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 17 July 2008

• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Alan Wu
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Michael Schneider
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Jie Bao
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 Phillips, Addison
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Ivan Herman
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Ivan Herman
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Axel Polleres
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• A comment about I18N proposal by Axel Polleres (ISSUE-126 and ISSUE-71) Boris Motik
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Bijan Parsia
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Michael Schneider
• RE: Resolution of ISSUE-67 implemented Michael Schneider
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Top and bottom roles in DL-Lite (ACTION-161) Boris Motik
• RE: Draft minutes from 16th of July 2008 available Boris Motik
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg
• Resolution of ISSUE-67 implemented Boris Motik
• Re: Draft minutes from 16th of July 2008 available Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Draft minutes from 16th of July 2008 available Boris Motik
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Michael Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg
• A summary of the proposal for a datatype system of OWL 2 (ISSUE-126) Boris Motik
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Alan Wu
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ACTION-159 Work to collect, propose how to address issues in making rdf list vocabulary (not) Alan Ruttenberg
• Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 15 July 2008

• Teleconference.2008.07.16/Agenda Ian Horrocks
• Agenda TC 16/07/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Second CfP OWLED 2008 Uli Sattler
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Michael Schneider
• RE: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Michael Schneider

Monday, 14 July 2008

• Minutes of UFDTF Teleconference 2008.07.14 available for review Ian Horrocks
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• a few owl i18n comments (not about language tags) Phillips, Addison
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 Phillips, Addison
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Michael Schneider
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Sandro Hawke
• RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) Ian Horrocks
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Axel Polleres
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman

Sunday, 13 July 2008

• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Boris Motik
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Michael Schneider
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Alan Wu

Saturday, 12 July 2008

• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Boris Motik
• 9th of July Telco Minutes ready for Review Michael Schneider
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Ivan Herman
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman

Friday, 11 July 2008

• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Boris Motik
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 10 July 2008

• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Bijan Parsia
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Ian Horrocks
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action Ian Horrocks
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Michael Smith
• Re: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in Michael Smith
• RE: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in Michael Smith
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Detection, where? How? (was Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114)) Bijan Parsia
• A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) Boris Motik
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• RE: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in Boris Motik
• Re: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in Ian Horrocks
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Detection, where? How? (was Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114)) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Michael Smith
• Detection, where? How? (was Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114)) Bijan Parsia
• RE: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Boris Motik
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Axel Polleres
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 Phillips, Addison

Wednesday, 9 July 2008

• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Axel Polleres
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Axel Polleres
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposal to close as withdrawn ISSUE-31 Michael Smith
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Jie Bao
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Bijan Parsia
• Proposal to close as withdrawn ISSUE-31 Bijan Parsia
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 Phillips, Addison
• RE: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Michael Schneider
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Bijan Parsia
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Felix Sasaki
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Jie Bao
• Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) Boris Motik
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Ivan Herman
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jie Bao
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Boris Motik
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Michel_Dumontier
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Rob Shearer
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Evan Wallace
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Michael Smith
• Re: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve Michael Smith
• RE: ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Pete Cordell
• Re: Process Bijan Parsia
• Process Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Bijan Parsia
• ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Michael Schneider
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Boris Motik
• Re: [meta] voting preparation time Bijan Parsia
• [meta] voting preparation time Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay
• Re: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda Bijan Parsia
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
• Re: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 8 July 2008

• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 Phillips, Addison
• Re: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda Bijan Parsia
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Rob Shearer
• RE: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve Michael Schneider
• Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] Michael Schneider
• Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda Ian Horrocks
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Michel_Dumontier
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Alan Ruttenberg
• Agenda TC 09/07/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) Boris Motik
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action Bijan Parsia
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. Bijan Parsia
• wiki fixed Sandro Hawke
• Re: OWL has a problem??? Sandro Hawke
• Re: OWL has a problem??? Rinke Hoekstra
• Fwd: OWL has a problem??? Alan Ruttenberg
• OWL has a problem??? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-133 (una in dl-lite): DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA Michael Smith
• RE: ISSUE-133 (una in dl-lite): DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA Boris Motik
• ISSUE-133 (una in dl-lite): DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Richard H. McCullough
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson

Monday, 7 July 2008

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Richard H. McCullough
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
• Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in Michael Smith
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Paul \
• ISSUE-87 proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action Ian Horrocks
• Re: discussion of ISSUE-16 - was draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• RE: Where I am about floats, etc. Boris Motik
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. Ivan Herman
• RE: Where I am about floats, etc. Boris Motik
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia

Sunday, 6 July 2008

• RE: Where I am about floats, etc. - ISSUE-126 Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Where I am about floats, etc. Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Richard H. McCullough
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson

Saturday, 5 July 2008

• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
• Re: Question about number types Dave Peterson

Friday, 4 July 2008

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about number types Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Question about number types Dave Peterson
• Re: Question about number types C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Question about number types Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about number types C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about number types C.M.Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Boris Motik
• Re: Question about number types Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Bijan Parsia
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 3 July 2008

• discussion of ISSUE-16 - was draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available Evan Wallace
• Re: Do we loose anything? (discussion on ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman
• Re: Do we loose anything? (discussion on ISSUE-131) Bijan Parsia
• Do we loose anything? (discussion on ISSUE-131) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 2 July 2008

• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) Sandro Hawke
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) Bijan Parsia
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) Alan Ruttenberg
• named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) Sandro Hawke
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Boris Motik
• Data URIs Bijan Parsia
• Disjointness of Double and Float and Decimal Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action Bijan Parsia
• Examples in primer and structural spec Bijan Parsia
• Re: State of rich annotations Bijan Parsia
• State of rich annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Evan Wallace
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Evan Wallace
• Re: Wrong action pointers in minutes Ian Horrocks
• Re: Wrong action pointers in minutes Sandro Hawke
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: State of the N-ary Bijan Parsia
• RE: Issue-114 Boris Motik
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Issue-114 Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: Issue-114 Michael Schneider
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes Bijan Parsia
• Re: State of the N-ary Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: State of the N-ary Bijan Parsia
• Re: State of the N-ary Ivan Herman
• RE: Issue-114 (punning) Boris Motik
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes Bijan Parsia
• Re: Issue-114 (punning) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Issue-114 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes Bijan Parsia
• ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action Boris Motik
• Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-128 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• Use areas (Re: State of the N-ary) Bijan Parsia
• Re: State of the N-ary Bijan Parsia
• State of the N-ary Bijan Parsia
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Bijan Parsia
• RE: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 1 July 2008

• RE: ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF and XML. [editorial] Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF and XML. [editorial] OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Ian Horrocks
• Re: Wrong action pointers in minutes Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: Agenda TC 02/07/2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Michael Smith
• Agenda TC 02/07/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: Issue-114 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Michael Smith
• Re: Issue-114 Evan Wallace
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Michael Smith
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: Issue-114 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Michael Smith
• Re: Issue-114 Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution Boris Motik
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Wrong action pointers in minutes Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Boris Motik
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Issue-114 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:41:36 UTC