Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126)

Let me go on record as opposing proposals that simple gloss over the 
peculiarities of
float and double and treat them as reals (thus I am agreeing with 
Bijan's and Michael Smith's
positions).  I would vastly prefer that we define our own real type and 
use some explicit
type coercion to compare values across these and other datatypes. 


Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 14:23:12 UTC