Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-07-09 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from July 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:15:58 +0100
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <85DC6F63-A9DA-4D65-BD70-129D4CCD6EB7@gmail.com>

On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> n-ary in a minimal form is currently in the spec. No one has  
> properly proposed removing them. So there they are.

Issue 127 mentions this. However we have decided not have this issue  
the subject of discussion until we have worked through whether there  
is a more substantive proposal for n-ary datatypes that is acceptable  
to the working group, in which case it would become moot.

-Alan

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 01:16:37 UTC